/- Port of `Lattice/AboveBelow.agda`: the flat lattice obtained by adjoining a top and bottom element to an (unordered, decidable-equality) type. With propositional equality the `_≈_` data type and its equivalence/decidability proofs disappear (`deriving DecidableEq`). The lattice itself cannot be lifted: mathlib has no "flat lattice on a discrete type". The `Lattice` instance is built with `Lattice.mk'`, which — exactly like the Agda module — consumes the two semilattices (comm/assoc, idempotence derived) plus the absorption laws, and defines `a ≤ b ↔ a ⊔ b = b` (Agda's `_≼_`). The Agda module's `Plain x` submodule (the witness `x` seeds the longest chain `⊥ ≺ [x] ≺ ⊤`) becomes `plainFixedHeight x`; the boundedness proof `isLongest` is restated through a rank function since chains are mathlib `LTSeries` rather than a pattern-matchable inductive (the `¬-Chain-⊤`-style case analysis lives in `rank_strictMono`). -/ import Spa.Lattice namespace Spa /-- Agda: `AboveBelow` with constructors `⊥`, `⊤`, `[_]`. -/ inductive AboveBelow (α : Type*) where | bot | top | mk (x : α) deriving DecidableEq namespace AboveBelow /-- Agda: the `Showable` instance. -/ instance {α : Type*} [ToString α] : ToString (AboveBelow α) where toString | bot => "⊥" | top => "⊤" | mk x => toString x variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] instance : Max (AboveBelow α) where max | bot, x => x | top, _ => top | mk x, mk y => if x = y then mk x else top | mk x, bot => mk x | mk _, top => top instance : Min (AboveBelow α) where min | bot, _ => bot | top, x => x | mk x, mk y => if x = y then mk x else bot | mk _, bot => bot | mk x, top => mk x /-! Agda: `⊥⊔x≡x`, `⊤⊔x≡⊤`, `x⊔⊥≡x`, `x⊔⊤≡⊤`, and the `[x]⊔[y]` reductions (`x≈y⇒[x]⊔[y]≡[x]` / `x̷≈y⇒[x]⊔[y]≡⊤` are the two branches of `mk_sup_mk`). -/ @[simp] theorem bot_sup (x : AboveBelow α) : bot ⊔ x = x := rfl @[simp] theorem top_sup (x : AboveBelow α) : top ⊔ x = top := rfl @[simp] theorem sup_bot (x : AboveBelow α) : x ⊔ bot = x := by cases x <;> rfl @[simp] theorem sup_top (x : AboveBelow α) : x ⊔ top = top := by cases x <;> rfl @[simp] theorem mk_sup_mk (x y : α) : (mk x ⊔ mk y : AboveBelow α) = if x = y then mk x else top := rfl @[simp] theorem bot_inf (x : AboveBelow α) : bot ⊓ x = bot := rfl @[simp] theorem top_inf (x : AboveBelow α) : top ⊓ x = x := rfl @[simp] theorem inf_bot (x : AboveBelow α) : x ⊓ bot = bot := by cases x <;> rfl @[simp] theorem inf_top (x : AboveBelow α) : x ⊓ top = x := by cases x <;> rfl @[simp] theorem mk_inf_mk (x y : α) : (mk x ⊓ mk y : AboveBelow α) = if x = y then mk x else bot := rfl /-- Agda: `⊔-comm`. -/ protected theorem sup_comm (a b : AboveBelow α) : a ⊔ b = b ⊔ a := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> simp only [bot_sup, sup_bot, top_sup, sup_top, mk_sup_mk] split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂ <;> simp_all /-- Agda: `⊔-assoc`. -/ protected theorem sup_assoc (a b c : AboveBelow α) : a ⊔ b ⊔ c = a ⊔ (b ⊔ c) := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> rcases c with _ | _ | z <;> simp only [bot_sup, sup_bot, top_sup, sup_top, mk_sup_mk] split_ifs <;> simp_all /-- Agda: `⊓-comm`. -/ protected theorem inf_comm (a b : AboveBelow α) : a ⊓ b = b ⊓ a := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> simp only [bot_inf, inf_bot, top_inf, inf_top, mk_inf_mk] split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂ <;> simp_all /-- Agda: `⊓-assoc`. -/ protected theorem inf_assoc (a b c : AboveBelow α) : a ⊓ b ⊓ c = a ⊓ (b ⊓ c) := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> rcases c with _ | _ | z <;> simp only [bot_inf, inf_bot, top_inf, inf_top, mk_inf_mk] split_ifs <;> simp_all /-- Agda: `absorb-⊔-⊓`. -/ protected theorem sup_inf_self (a b : AboveBelow α) : a ⊔ a ⊓ b = a := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> simp only [bot_sup, sup_bot, top_sup, sup_top, mk_sup_mk, bot_inf, inf_bot, top_inf, inf_top, mk_inf_mk] <;> try (split_ifs <;> simp_all) /-- Agda: `absorb-⊓-⊔`. -/ protected theorem inf_sup_self (a b : AboveBelow α) : a ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a := by rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y <;> simp only [bot_sup, sup_bot, top_sup, sup_top, mk_sup_mk, bot_inf, inf_bot, top_inf, inf_top, mk_inf_mk] <;> try (split_ifs <;> simp_all) /-- Agda: `isLattice` (via the two semilattices + absorption, like the Agda record; `Lattice.mk'` derives idempotence and sets `a ≤ b ↔ a ⊔ b = b`). -/ instance : Lattice (AboveBelow α) := Lattice.mk' AboveBelow.sup_comm AboveBelow.sup_assoc AboveBelow.inf_comm AboveBelow.inf_assoc AboveBelow.sup_inf_self AboveBelow.inf_sup_self theorem le_iff {a b : AboveBelow α} : a ≤ b ↔ a ⊔ b = b := sup_eq_right.symm /-- Agda: `⊥≺[x]` (the `≤` part; `⊥` is least). -/ theorem bot_le' (a : AboveBelow α) : (bot : AboveBelow α) ≤ a := le_iff.mpr (bot_sup a) /-- Agda: `[x]≺⊤` (the `≤` part; `⊤` is greatest). -/ theorem le_top' (a : AboveBelow α) : a ≤ (top : AboveBelow α) := le_iff.mpr (sup_top a) theorem bot_lt_mk (x : α) : (bot : AboveBelow α) < mk x := lt_of_le_of_ne (bot_le' _) (by simp) theorem mk_lt_top (x : α) : (mk x : AboveBelow α) < top := lt_of_le_of_ne (le_top' _) (by simp) theorem bot_lt_top : (bot : AboveBelow α) < top := lt_of_le_of_ne (bot_le' _) (by simp) /-- The order of the flat lattice, by cases (used to discharge the monotonicity obligations that were `postulate`d in `Analysis/Sign.agda` and `Analysis/Constant.agda`). -/ theorem le_cases {a b : AboveBelow α} (h : a ≤ b) : a = bot ∨ b = top ∨ a = b := by have hsup := le_iff.mp h rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y · exact Or.inl rfl · exact Or.inr (Or.inl rfl) · exact Or.inl rfl · exact absurd hsup (by simp) · exact Or.inr (Or.inl rfl) · exact absurd hsup (by simp) · exact absurd hsup (by simp) · exact Or.inr (Or.inl rfl) · rw [mk_sup_mk] at hsup by_cases hxy : x = y · exact Or.inr (Or.inr (by rw [hxy])) · rw [if_neg hxy] at hsup exact absurd hsup (by simp) /-- Rank of an element: `⊥ ↦ 0`, `[x] ↦ 1`, `⊤ ↦ 2`. Used to bound chains (Agda's `isLongest` / `x≺[y]⇒x≡⊥` / `[x]≺y⇒y≡⊤` case analysis lives here). -/ def rank : AboveBelow α → ℕ | bot => 0 | mk _ => 1 | top => 2 /-- Agda: the impossibility of `[x] ≺ [y]` (combines `x≺[y]⇒x≡⊥` and `[x]≺y⇒y≡⊤`: the flat middle layer is an antichain). -/ theorem not_mk_lt_mk (x y : α) : ¬(mk x : AboveBelow α) < mk y := by intro h obtain ⟨hle, hne⟩ := lt_iff_le_and_ne.mp h have hsup := le_iff.mp hle rw [mk_sup_mk] at hsup by_cases hxy : x = y · rw [if_pos hxy] at hsup exact hne hsup · rw [if_neg hxy] at hsup exact absurd hsup (by simp) theorem rank_strictMono : StrictMono (rank : AboveBelow α → ℕ) := by intro a b hab rcases a with _ | _ | x <;> rcases b with _ | _ | y · exact absurd hab (lt_irrefl _) · simp [rank] · simp [rank] · exact absurd hab (bot_le' _).not_lt · exact absurd hab (lt_irrefl _) · exact absurd hab (le_top' _).not_lt · exact absurd hab (bot_le' _).not_lt · simp [rank] · exact absurd hab (not_mk_lt_mk x y) /-- Agda: `isLongest` — no chain is longer than 2. -/ theorem boundedChains : BoundedChains (AboveBelow α) 2 := fun c => by have h := LTSeries.head_add_length_le_nat (c.map rank rank_strictMono) rw [LTSeries.head_map, LTSeries.last_map, LTSeries.map_length] at h have h2 : rank c.last ≤ 2 := by cases c.last <;> simp [rank] omega /-- Agda: `Plain.longestChain` and `Plain.fixedHeight` — the witness `x` seeds the chain `⊥ ≺ [x] ≺ ⊤` of length 2. -/ def plainFixedHeight (x : α) : FixedHeight (AboveBelow α) 2 where bot := bot top := top longestChain := ((RelSeries.singleton _ bot).snoc (mk x) (by rw [RelSeries.last_singleton]; exact bot_lt_mk x)).snoc top (by rw [RelSeries.last_snoc]; exact mk_lt_top x) head_longestChain := by simp last_longestChain := by simp length_longestChain := by simp [RelSeries.snoc, RelSeries.append] bounded := boundedChains /-- Agda: `Plain.isFiniteHeightLattice` / `Plain.finiteHeightLattice` (`default` plays the role of the Agda module parameter `x`). -/ instance [Inhabited α] : FiniteHeightLattice (AboveBelow α) where height := 2 fixedHeight := plainFixedHeight default end AboveBelow end Spa