Add problem document
This commit is contained in:
parent
baf52a9fc3
commit
1773c2bf9e
|
@ -13,7 +13,10 @@
|
|||
same ways they did decades ago, exerting needless time and effort.
|
||||
We propose an automated, fenceless grazing system that would allow
|
||||
for the management of cattle through a digital interface, rather than
|
||||
through physical labor.
|
||||
through physical labor. This system will consist of a collar
|
||||
worn by individual farm animals that is capable of emitting loud
|
||||
noises and administering mild shocks in order to control their
|
||||
behavior.
|
||||
\end{abstract}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Introduction}
|
||||
|
@ -48,8 +51,6 @@ a description of the "allowed" area, can be used to judge whether or not
|
|||
an animal is "out of bounds", and thus, if action should be taken to return
|
||||
it to a desired location.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO Mention how the information will be relayed
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Sound and Shock}
|
||||
Simply knowing the location of an animal is not particularly helpful for
|
||||
reducing the amount of human and animal labor that is needed for cattle
|
||||
|
@ -65,6 +66,16 @@ Should this be successful, farmer intervention will be unnecessary -
|
|||
all the actions described above can be performed automatically by
|
||||
the collar.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{LoRa}
|
||||
It is one of the requirements for the product that the collar uses Long Range
|
||||
(LoRa) technology to communicate with the controller and potentially
|
||||
with other collars. LoRa can be used for long-range, low-power communication,
|
||||
which is excellent for the type of product that were are developing. It is
|
||||
important that the collar is able to support herds spread over wide
|
||||
areas (to support big farms), and also be power efficient enough
|
||||
to prevent the need for frequent maintenance. The client specifically
|
||||
requested LoRa to be the protocol of choice.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{External Control System}
|
||||
It is not difficult to imagine a situation in which the desired location
|
||||
of a herd of animals changes. In such a case, the collars will need
|
||||
|
@ -75,7 +86,7 @@ without having to be physically present with the cattle. In the best
|
|||
case scenario, this interface will also allow users to monitor
|
||||
in real time the location of the animals as they graze in a particular area.
|
||||
|
||||
Such an external control system can be implemented as mobile app. Users
|
||||
The current idea for such a control system is a mobile app. Users
|
||||
of this app will be able to modify the grazing boundaries of a herd through the
|
||||
use of their mobile device.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -102,6 +113,11 @@ the changes being reflected in the operation of the collar prototypes discussed
|
|||
Finally, in order to determine whether or not the project has been completed,
|
||||
it will be necessary to ensure that the prototype can be used in the field.
|
||||
If a prototype is not fit for testing on real animals, it should not be
|
||||
considered complete.
|
||||
considered complete. Whether or not the proposed techniques are effective
|
||||
at keeping cattle is another question - it's not outside the realm of
|
||||
possibility that electric shocks and sounds are ineffective at manipulting
|
||||
the behavior of farm animals. Thus, whether or not the device is effective
|
||||
should not be a performance metric. However, to reiterate, it must
|
||||
be possible to at least test it in the field.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{document}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user