Apply aesop to reduce proofs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ inductive Run (prog : Program) where
|
||||
| cons (s : prog.State) (bs : BasicStmt) (hc : prog.code s = some bs)
|
||||
(rest : Run prog) : Run prog
|
||||
|
||||
@[aesop unsafe cases]
|
||||
inductive LastAssign (prog : Program) (x : String) : Run prog → prog.NodeId → Prop
|
||||
| here (s : prog.State) (e : Expr) (hc : prog.code s = some (.assign x e))
|
||||
(rest : Run prog) :
|
||||
@@ -60,22 +61,6 @@ inductive LastAssign (prog : Program) (x : String) : Run prog → prog.NodeId
|
||||
(∀ e, bs ≠ .assign x e) → LastAssign prog x rest n →
|
||||
LastAssign prog x (Run.cons s bs hc rest) n
|
||||
|
||||
lemma lastAssign_cons_here {x : String} {s : prog.State} {e : Expr}
|
||||
{hc : prog.code s = some (.assign x e)} {rest : Run prog} {n : prog.NodeId}
|
||||
(h : LastAssign prog x (Run.cons s (.assign x e) hc rest) n) :
|
||||
n = prog.nodeIdOfNonempty s hc := by
|
||||
cases h with
|
||||
| here _ _ _ _ => rfl
|
||||
| there _ _ _ _ hne _ => exact absurd rfl (hne e)
|
||||
|
||||
lemma lastAssign_cons_of_ne {x : String} {s : prog.State} {bs : BasicStmt}
|
||||
{hc : prog.code s = some bs} {rest : Run prog} {n : prog.NodeId}
|
||||
(h : LastAssign prog x (Run.cons s bs hc rest) n)
|
||||
(hne : ∀ e, bs ≠ .assign x e) : LastAssign prog x rest n := by
|
||||
cases h with
|
||||
| here _ e' _ _ => exact absurd rfl (hne e')
|
||||
| there _ _ _ _ _ hp => exact hp
|
||||
|
||||
instance stateInterp : StateInterp (DefSet prog) prog where
|
||||
St := fun _ => Run prog
|
||||
init := Run.nil
|
||||
@@ -84,14 +69,10 @@ instance stateInterp : StateInterp (DefSet prog) prog where
|
||||
interp_sup := by
|
||||
intro vs₁ vs₂ ρ run h x assigners hmem n hla
|
||||
obtain ⟨a₁, a₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩ := FiniteMap.mem_sup hmem
|
||||
rw [Pi.sup_apply]
|
||||
rcases h with h | h
|
||||
· aesop
|
||||
· aesop
|
||||
aesop
|
||||
interp_inf := by
|
||||
intro vs₁ vs₂ ρ run h x assigners hmem n hla
|
||||
obtain ⟨a₁, a₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩ := FiniteMap.mem_inf hmem
|
||||
rw [Pi.inf_apply]
|
||||
aesop
|
||||
|
||||
instance validStateEvaluator : ValidStateEvaluator (DefSet prog) prog where
|
||||
@@ -99,10 +80,7 @@ instance validStateEvaluator : ValidStateEvaluator (DefSet prog) prog where
|
||||
valid := by
|
||||
intro s ρ₁ ρ₂ bs vs st hcode hbs hvs
|
||||
cases hbs with
|
||||
| noop =>
|
||||
intro x assigners hmem n hla
|
||||
exact hvs x assigners hmem n
|
||||
(lastAssign_cons_of_ne prog hla (fun _ h => BasicStmt.noConfusion h))
|
||||
| noop => intro x assigners hmem n hla; aesop
|
||||
| assign x e v hev =>
|
||||
intro k assigners hmem n hla
|
||||
have hmem2 : (k, assigners) ∈
|
||||
@@ -110,15 +88,10 @@ instance validStateEvaluator : ValidStateEvaluator (DefSet prog) prog where
|
||||
by_cases hx : k = x
|
||||
· subst hx
|
||||
have hd := FiniteMap.generalizedUpdate_mem_eq (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) hmem2
|
||||
have hn := lastAssign_cons_here prog hla
|
||||
subst hd
|
||||
rw [hn]
|
||||
simp only [genSet, Function.update_self]
|
||||
· have hp := lastAssign_cons_of_ne prog hla
|
||||
(by intro e' h; injection h with h1 _; exact hx h1.symm)
|
||||
have hmem' := FiniteMap.generalizedUpdate_not_mem_backward
|
||||
aesop (add simp genSet)
|
||||
· have hmem' := FiniteMap.generalizedUpdate_not_mem_backward
|
||||
(fun hc => hx (List.mem_singleton.mp hc)) hmem2
|
||||
exact hvs k assigners hmem' n hp
|
||||
aesop
|
||||
botV_init := by intro x assigners _ n hla; cases hla
|
||||
|
||||
theorem analyze_correct {ρ : Env} (hrun : EvalStmt [] prog.rootStmt ρ) :
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user