Add proof of reaching definition analysis

This requires a few pieces:

* Make node tags use `Fin n` intead of natural numbers. This makes
  it possible to build a finite lattice over AST nodes, and also
  ensure automatic, total indexing from CFG nodes into the AST that
  created them. For this, use the elaborator to derive the ordering
  statements etc. where possible.
* Adjust the forward framework to enable proofs that don't just state
  correctness on the environment, but also on an arbitrary additional
  state accumulated from traversing the trace.
* State the reaching definition analysis's correctness in terms
  of this new framework.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

lean/Spa/Analysis/Forward/Lattices.lean

@@ -64,39 +64,47 @@ lemma variablesAt_joinAll (s : prog.State) (sv : StateVariables L prog) :
     variablesAt s (joinAll sv) = joinForKey s sv :=
   joinAll_mem_eq (variablesAt_mem s (joinAll sv))
 
-/-! ### Lifting an interpretation to variable maps -/
+class StateInterp (L : Type) [Lattice L] (prog : Program) where
+  St : Env → Type
+  init : St []
+  interp : VariableValues L prog → (ρ : Env) → St ρ → Prop
+  interp_sup : ∀ {vs₁ vs₂ : VariableValues L prog} {ρ : Env} {st : St ρ},
+    interp vs₁ ρ st ∨ interp vs₂ ρ st → interp (vs₁ ⊔ vs₂) ρ st
+  interp_inf : ∀ {vs₁ vs₂ : VariableValues L prog} {ρ : Env} {st : St ρ},
+    interp vs₁ ρ st ∧ interp vs₂ ρ st → interp (vs₁ ⊓ vs₂) ρ st
 
-variable [I : LatticeInterpretation L]
+instance [S : StateInterp L prog] :
+    Interp (VariableValues L prog) ((ρ : Env) → S.St ρ → Prop) :=
+  ⟨S.interp⟩
 
-omit [FiniteHeightLattice L] in
-instance : Interp (VariableValues L prog) (Env → Prop) where
-  interp (vs : VariableValues L prog) (ρ : Env) : Prop :=
-    ∀ (k : String) (l : L), (k, l) ∈ vs →
-      ∀ (v : Value), Env.Mem (k, v) ρ → I.interp l v
-
-lemma interp_botV_nil : ⟦ botV L prog ⟧ [] := by
-  intro k l _ v hmem
-  cases hmem
-
-omit [FiniteHeightLattice L] in
-lemma interp_sup {vs₁ vs₂ : VariableValues L prog} {ρ : Env}
-    (h : ⟦ vs₁⟧ ρ ∨ ⟦ vs₂ ⟧ ρ) : ⟦ vs₁ ⊔ vs₂ ⟧ ρ := by
-  intro k l hmem v hv
-  obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩ := FiniteMap.mem_sup hmem
-  rcases h with h | h
-  · exact I.interp_sup v (Or.inl (h _ _ h₁ _ hv))
-  · exact I.interp_sup v (Or.inr (h _ _ h₂ _ hv))
-
-lemma interp_foldr {vs : VariableValues L prog}
-    {vss : List (VariableValues L prog)} {ρ : Env}
-    (hvs : ⟦ vs ⟧ ρ) (hmem : vs ∈ vss) :
-    ⟦ vss.foldr (· ⊔ ·) (botV L prog) ⟧ ρ := by
+lemma interp_foldr [S : StateInterp L prog]
+    {vs : VariableValues L prog} {vss : List (VariableValues L prog)}
+    {ρ : Env} {st : S.St ρ} (hvs : ⟦ vs ⟧ ρ st) (hmem : vs ∈ vss) :
+    ⟦ vss.foldr (· ⊔ ·) (botV L prog) ⟧ ρ st := by
   induction vss with
   | nil => cases hmem
   | cons vs' vss' ih =>
     rcases List.mem_cons.mp hmem with rfl | hmem'
-    · exact interp_sup (Or.inl hvs)
-    · exact interp_sup (Or.inr (ih hmem'))
+    · exact S.interp_sup (Or.inl hvs)
+    · exact S.interp_sup (Or.inr (ih hmem'))
+
+variable [I : LatticeInterpretation L]
+
+instance : StateInterp L prog where
+  St := fun _ => PUnit
+  init := PUnit.unit
+  interp vs ρ _ := ∀ (k : String) (l : L), (k, l) ∈ vs →
+    ∀ (v : Value), Env.Mem (k, v) ρ → I.interp l v
+  interp_sup := by
+    intro vs₁ vs₂ ρ st h k l hmem v hv
+    obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩ := FiniteMap.mem_sup hmem
+    rcases h with h | h
+    · exact I.interp_sup v (Or.inl (h _ _ h₁ _ hv))
+    · exact I.interp_sup v (Or.inr (h _ _ h₂ _ hv))
+  interp_inf := by
+    intro vs₁ vs₂ ρ st h k l hmem v hv
+    obtain ⟨l₁, l₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩ := FiniteMap.mem_inf hmem
+    exact I.interp_inf v ⟨h.1 _ _ h₁ _ hv, h.2 _ _ h₂ _ hv⟩
 
 end Forward