Add some minor additional sections to report.
This commit is contained in:
parent
90a5aed6ec
commit
f317a7e8da
|
@ -359,6 +359,27 @@ space incurred, an entire column is approximately $100\lambda$ wide.
|
|||
\label{fig:layout-arrayed}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\pagebreak
|
||||
\section{Further Design Ideas}
|
||||
I discovered -- from other people in the class -- that an 8-column design was plausible.
|
||||
Unfortunately, I was only convinced a day or so before the project was due, which did not give me
|
||||
enough time to redesign my SRAM. I have seen students successfully using
|
||||
the 8-column design by sharing \textsc{Wl} wires for each 'row', and using
|
||||
the remaining 3 bits to enable and disable the write block. Since reading does
|
||||
not change the cell value, this is a viable approach; all 8 columns would ``read''
|
||||
(except during writing, in which 7 columns would read and 1 would write). As
|
||||
long as a proper address selection mechanism is implemented into the read collector
|
||||
circuit (which at present cannot handle concurrent reads), this would work just
|
||||
fine, albeit at the expense of added power consumption (from draining and re-charging
|
||||
7 extra wires). This design, combined with my idea of placing the write block
|
||||
in the middle of the column, can lead to very short effective wire lengths. If
|
||||
I was to approach this project again, that's what I would try.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Acknowledgements}
|
||||
Reed's aforementioned idea of sharing well contacts between adjacent cells
|
||||
played a part in my design. Also, without the other students in the class
|
||||
Discord, I would not have known to use the ``better'' wire model at all.
|
||||
|
||||
\pagebreak
|
||||
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
|
||||
\bibliography{bibliography}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user