256 lines
9.7 KiB
Coq
256 lines
9.7 KiB
Coq
Require Import Coq.ZArith.Int.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Lists.ListSet.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Vectors.VectorDef.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Vectors.Fin.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Program.Equality.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Logic.Eqdep_dec.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Arith.Peano_dec.
|
|
Require Import Coq.Program.Wf.
|
|
Require Import Lia.
|
|
|
|
Module DayEight (Import M:Int).
|
|
(* We need to coerce natural numbers into integers to add them. *)
|
|
Parameter nat_to_t : nat -> t.
|
|
(* We need a way to convert integers back into finite sets. *)
|
|
Parameter clamp : forall {n}, t -> option (Fin.t n).
|
|
|
|
Definition fin := Fin.t.
|
|
|
|
(* The opcode of our instructions. *)
|
|
Inductive opcode : Type :=
|
|
| add
|
|
| nop
|
|
| jmp.
|
|
|
|
(* The result of running a program is either the accumulator
|
|
or an infinite loop error. In the latter case, we return the
|
|
set of instructions that we tried. *)
|
|
Inductive run_result {n : nat} : Type :=
|
|
| Ok : t -> run_result
|
|
| Fail : set (fin n) -> run_result.
|
|
|
|
(* A single program state .*)
|
|
Definition state n : Type := (fin (S n) * set (fin n) * t).
|
|
|
|
(* An instruction is a pair of an opcode and an argument. *)
|
|
Definition inst : Type := (opcode * t).
|
|
(* An input is a bounded list of instructions. *)
|
|
Definition input (n : nat) := VectorDef.t inst n.
|
|
(* 'indices' represents the list of instruction
|
|
addresses, which are used for calculating jumps. *)
|
|
Definition indices (n : nat) := VectorDef.t (fin n) n.
|
|
|
|
(* Change a jump to a nop, or a nop to a jump. *)
|
|
Definition swap (i : inst) : inst :=
|
|
match i with
|
|
| (add, t) => (add, t)
|
|
| (nop, t) => (jmp, t)
|
|
| (jmp, t) => (nop, t)
|
|
end.
|
|
|
|
Inductive swappable : inst -> Prop :=
|
|
| swap_nop : forall t, swappable (nop, t)
|
|
| swap_jmp : forall t, swappable (jmp, t).
|
|
|
|
(* Compute the destination jump index, an integer. *)
|
|
Definition jump_t {n} (pc : fin n) (off : t) : t :=
|
|
M.add (nat_to_t (proj1_sig (to_nat pc))) off.
|
|
|
|
(* Compute a destination index that's valid.
|
|
Not all inputs are valid, so this may fail. *)
|
|
Definition valid_jump_t {n} (pc : fin n) (off : t) : option (fin (S n)) := @clamp (S n) (jump_t pc off).
|
|
|
|
(* Cast a fin n to a fin (S n). *)
|
|
Fixpoint weaken_one {n} (f : fin n) : fin (S n) :=
|
|
match f with
|
|
| F1 => F1
|
|
| FS f' => FS (weaken_one f')
|
|
end.
|
|
|
|
(* Convert a nat to fin. *)
|
|
Fixpoint nat_to_fin (n : nat) : fin (S n) :=
|
|
match n with
|
|
| O => F1
|
|
| S n' => FS (nat_to_fin n')
|
|
end.
|
|
|
|
(* A finite natural is either its maximum value (aka nat_to_fin n),
|
|
or it's not thatbig, which means it can be cast down to
|
|
a fin (pred n). *)
|
|
Lemma fin_big_or_small : forall {n} (f : fin (S n)),
|
|
(f = nat_to_fin n) \/ (exists (f' : fin n), f = weaken_one f').
|
|
Proof.
|
|
(* Hey, looks like the creator of Fin provided
|
|
us with nice inductive principles. Using Coq's
|
|
default `induction` breaks here.
|
|
|
|
Merci, Pierre! *)
|
|
apply Fin.rectS.
|
|
- intros n. destruct n.
|
|
+ left. reflexivity.
|
|
+ right. exists F1. auto.
|
|
- intros n p IH.
|
|
destruct IH.
|
|
+ left. rewrite H. reflexivity.
|
|
+ right. destruct H as [f' Heq].
|
|
exists (FS f'). simpl. rewrite Heq.
|
|
reflexivity.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
|
|
(* One modification: we really want to use 'allowed' addresses,
|
|
a set that shrinks as the program continues, rather than 'visited'
|
|
addresses, a set that increases as the program continues. *)
|
|
Inductive step_noswap {n} : inst -> (fin n * t) -> (fin (S n) * t) -> Prop :=
|
|
| step_noswap_add : forall pc acc t,
|
|
step_noswap (add, t) (pc, acc) (FS pc, M.add acc t)
|
|
| step_noswap_nop : forall pc acc t,
|
|
step_noswap (nop, t) (pc, acc) (FS pc, acc)
|
|
| step_noswap_jmp : forall pc pc' acc t,
|
|
valid_jump_t pc t = Some pc' ->
|
|
step_noswap (jmp, t) (pc, acc) (pc', acc).
|
|
|
|
Inductive done {n} : input n -> state n -> Prop :=
|
|
| done_prog : forall inp v acc, done inp (nat_to_fin n, v, acc).
|
|
|
|
Inductive stuck {n} : input n -> state n -> Prop :=
|
|
| stuck_prog : forall inp pc' v acc,
|
|
~ set_In pc' v -> stuck inp (weaken_one pc', v, acc).
|
|
|
|
Inductive run_noswap {n} : input n -> state n -> state n -> Prop :=
|
|
| run_noswap_ok : forall inp st, done inp st -> run_noswap inp st st
|
|
| run_noswap_fail : forall inp st, stuck inp st -> run_noswap inp st st
|
|
| run_noswap_trans : forall inp pc pc' v acc acc' st',
|
|
set_In pc v ->
|
|
step_noswap (nth inp pc) (pc, acc) (pc', acc') ->
|
|
run_noswap inp (pc', set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc v, acc') st' ->
|
|
run_noswap inp (weaken_one pc, v, acc) st'.
|
|
|
|
Inductive run_swap {n} : input n -> state n -> state n -> Prop :=
|
|
| run_swap_normal : forall inp pc pc' v acc acc' st',
|
|
set_In pc v ->
|
|
~ swappable (nth inp pc) ->
|
|
step_noswap (nth inp pc) (pc, acc) (pc', acc') ->
|
|
run_swap inp (pc', set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc v, acc') st' ->
|
|
run_swap inp (weaken_one pc, v, acc) st'
|
|
| run_swap_swapped_ok : forall inp pc pc' v acc acc' st',
|
|
set_In pc v ->
|
|
swappable (nth inp pc) ->
|
|
step_noswap (swap (nth inp pc)) (pc, acc) (pc', acc') ->
|
|
run_noswap inp (pc', set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc v, acc') st' ->
|
|
done inp st' ->
|
|
run_swap inp (weaken_one pc, v, acc) st'
|
|
| run_swap_swapped_next : forall inp pc pc'w pc'n v acc acc'w acc'n st'w st'n,
|
|
set_In pc v ->
|
|
swappable (nth inp pc) ->
|
|
step_noswap (swap (nth inp pc)) (pc, acc) (pc'w, acc'w) ->
|
|
run_noswap inp (pc'w, set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc v, acc'w) st'w ->
|
|
stuck inp st'w ->
|
|
step_noswap (nth inp pc) (pc, acc) (pc'n, acc'n) ->
|
|
run_swap inp (pc'n, set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc v, acc'n) st'n ->
|
|
run_swap inp (weaken_one pc, v, acc) st'n.
|
|
|
|
Inductive valid_inst {n} : inst -> fin n -> Prop :=
|
|
| valid_inst_add : forall t f, valid_inst (add, t) f
|
|
| valid_inst_nop : forall t f f',
|
|
valid_jump_t f t = Some f' -> valid_inst (nop, t) f
|
|
| valid_inst_jmp : forall t f f',
|
|
valid_jump_t f t = Some f' -> valid_inst (jmp, t) f.
|
|
|
|
(* An input is valid if all its instructions are valid. *)
|
|
Definition valid_input {n} (inp : input n) : Prop := forall (pc : fin n),
|
|
valid_inst (nth inp pc) pc.
|
|
|
|
Section ValidInput.
|
|
Variable n : nat.
|
|
Variable inp : input n.
|
|
Hypothesis Hv : valid_input inp.
|
|
|
|
Theorem valid_input_can_step : forall pc acc, exists pc' acc',
|
|
step_noswap (nth inp pc) (pc, acc) (pc', acc').
|
|
Proof.
|
|
intros pc acc.
|
|
destruct (nth inp pc) eqn:Hop.
|
|
destruct o.
|
|
- exists (FS pc). exists (M.add acc t0). apply step_noswap_add.
|
|
- exists (FS pc). exists acc. eapply step_noswap_nop.
|
|
- specialize (Hv pc). rewrite Hop in Hv. inversion Hv; subst.
|
|
exists f'. exists acc. eapply step_noswap_jmp. apply H0.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
|
|
(* A program is either done, stuck (at an invalid/visited address), or can step. *)
|
|
Theorem valid_input_progress : forall pc v acc,
|
|
(pc = nat_to_fin n /\ done inp (pc, v, acc)) \/
|
|
(exists pcs, pc = weaken_one pcs /\
|
|
((~ set_In pcs v /\ stuck inp (pc, v, acc)) \/
|
|
(exists pc' acc', set_In pcs v /\
|
|
step_noswap (nth inp pcs) (pcs, acc) (pc', acc')))).
|
|
Proof.
|
|
intros pc v acc.
|
|
(* Have we reached the end? *)
|
|
destruct (fin_big_or_small pc).
|
|
(* We're at the end, so we're done. *)
|
|
left. rewrite H. split. reflexivity. apply done_prog.
|
|
(* We're not at the end. *)
|
|
right. destruct H as [pcs H]. exists pcs. rewrite H. split. reflexivity.
|
|
(* We're not at the end. Is the PC valid? *)
|
|
destruct (set_In_dec Fin.eq_dec pcs v).
|
|
- (* It is. *)
|
|
right.
|
|
destruct (valid_input_can_step pcs acc) as [pc' [acc' Hstep]].
|
|
exists pc'; exists acc'; auto.
|
|
- (* It is not. *)
|
|
left. split; auto. apply stuck_prog; auto.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
|
|
Theorem list_length_induction {X : Type} (P : list X -> Prop) :
|
|
(forall l, (forall l', length l' < length l -> P l') -> P l) ->
|
|
forall l, P l.
|
|
Proof.
|
|
intros Hrec.
|
|
assert (forall (l l' : list X), length l' <= length l -> P l').
|
|
{ induction l; intros l' Hlen; apply Hrec; intros l'0 Hlen0.
|
|
- simpl in Hlen. lia.
|
|
- apply IHl. simpl in Hlen. lia. }
|
|
intros l. apply H with l. lia.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
|
|
Theorem set_remove_length : forall (f : fin n) (s : set (fin n)),
|
|
set_In f s ->
|
|
length (set_remove Fin.eq_dec f s) < length s.
|
|
Proof.
|
|
intros f s Hin.
|
|
induction s.
|
|
- inversion Hin.
|
|
- simpl. destruct (Fin.eq_dec f a) eqn:Heq.
|
|
+ unfold lt. apply le_n. (* Why couldn't lia get this one? *)
|
|
+ inversion Hin; subst. exfalso. apply n0. auto.
|
|
apply IHs in H. simpl. lia.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
|
|
Theorem valid_input_terminates : forall (pc : fin (S n)) (v : set (fin n)) (acc : t),
|
|
(exists pc', run_noswap inp (pc, v, acc) pc').
|
|
Proof.
|
|
intros pc v. generalize dependent pc.
|
|
induction v using list_length_induction.
|
|
intros pc acc.
|
|
destruct (valid_input_progress pc l acc) as [[_ Hd]|[pc' [Hw [[_ Hst]|[pc'' [acc'' [Hin Hst]]]]]]].
|
|
- (* We're done. *)
|
|
eexists. apply run_noswap_ok. apply Hd.
|
|
- (* We're stuck. *)
|
|
eexists. apply run_noswap_fail. apply Hst.
|
|
- (* We can make a step. This will remove our current PC from the valid list, *)
|
|
edestruct (H (set_remove Fin.eq_dec pc' l)).
|
|
(* Since the PC must be in the list, removing it makes the list smaller. *)
|
|
apply (set_remove_length _ _ Hin).
|
|
(* Without the current PC, our valid set shrinks.
|
|
Since this is the inductive step, we have assumed
|
|
that programs with smaller sets of valid PCs always
|
|
terminate. Thus, after we make the step, we're done. *)
|
|
exists x. subst. eapply run_noswap_trans.
|
|
+ auto.
|
|
+ apply Hst.
|
|
+ apply H0.
|
|
Qed.
|
|
End ValidInput.
|
|
End DayEight.
|