Lean migration: typeclass-based parameter passing, as in the Agda original
The port had flattened Agda's instance arguments ({{flA}}, {{evaluator}},
{{latticeInterpretation}}, {{validEvaluator}}) into explicitly threaded
values (fhL, E, I, hE). Restore them as typeclasses:
- Spa.FiniteHeightLattice: now actually used — Fixedpoint takes the
instance instead of a FixedHeight value; FiniteMap gets the missing
instance (height = ks.length * height B), so varsFixedHeight /
statesFixedHeight / signFixedHeight / constFixedHeight plumbing
disappears (instance bottoms are defeq to the old ones)
- Spa.Analysis.Forward.Evaluation: StmtEvaluator/ExprEvaluator become
classes; the Valid* Props become Prop-classes, as in Agda
- Spa.Analysis.Forward.Adapters: the expr→stmt adapter and its validity
are instances (Agda: the ExprToStmtAdapter instances)
- LatticeInterpretation is a class; sign/const interpretations,
evaluators and validity proofs are instances; use sites read like the
Agda module applications: result SignLattice prog
Proof simplifications (same theorems, proofs factored):
- Spa.Lattice.AboveBelow.monotone₂_of_strict: any ⊥-strict/⊤-dominated
operation on a flat lattice is monotone — replaces the four near-
identical case bashes per analysis (postulates in Agda)
- Spa.Lattice.AboveBelow.interp_sup_of/interp_inf_of: the shared flat-
lattice interpretation case analysis, making interpSign_sup/inf and
interpConst_sup/inf one-liners
lake build green with zero warnings; lake exe spa output verified
byte-identical (diff) to the previous, Agda-verified output.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ steps, or we would build a `<`-chain longer than the longest one. We
|
||||
deliberately do *not* use mathlib's `OrderHom.lfp` (different proof approach,
|
||||
and not computable).
|
||||
|
||||
As in Agda — where the module took `{{flA : IsFiniteHeightLattice A h …}}` —
|
||||
the finite-height structure arrives by instance resolution
|
||||
(`[FiniteHeightLattice α]`); only `f` and its monotonicity are explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
Correspondence:
|
||||
doStep ↦ Spa.Fixedpoint.doStep (the chain argument now carries
|
||||
`a₁ = ⊥` and its length in the
|
||||
@@ -21,55 +25,58 @@ import Spa.Lattice
|
||||
|
||||
namespace Spa.Fixedpoint
|
||||
|
||||
variable {α : Type*} [Lattice α] [DecidableEq α] {h : ℕ}
|
||||
open FiniteHeightLattice (height fixedHeight)
|
||||
|
||||
variable {α : Type*} [Lattice α] [DecidableEq α] [FiniteHeightLattice α]
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `doStep`. `g` is gas; the invariant `c.length + g = h + 1` guarantees
|
||||
that when gas runs out the chain contradicts boundedness. -/
|
||||
def doStep (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) :
|
||||
∀ (g : ℕ) (c : LTSeries α), c.length + g = h + 1 →
|
||||
def doStep (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) :
|
||||
∀ (g : ℕ) (c : LTSeries α), c.length + g = height (α := α) + 1 →
|
||||
c.last ≤ f c.last → {a : α // a = f a}
|
||||
| 0, c, hlen, _ =>
|
||||
absurd (fh.bounded c) (by omega)
|
||||
absurd ((fixedHeight (α := α)).bounded c) (by omega)
|
||||
| g + 1, c, hlen, hle =>
|
||||
if heq : c.last = f c.last then
|
||||
⟨c.last, heq⟩
|
||||
else
|
||||
doStep fh f hf g (c.snoc (f c.last) (lt_of_le_of_ne hle heq))
|
||||
doStep f hf g (c.snoc (f c.last) (lt_of_le_of_ne hle heq))
|
||||
(by simp [RelSeries.snoc]; omega)
|
||||
(by rw [RelSeries.last_snoc]; exact hf hle)
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `fix`. Start iterating from `⊥`. -/
|
||||
def fix (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) : {a : α // a = f a} :=
|
||||
doStep fh f hf (h + 1) (RelSeries.singleton _ fh.bot)
|
||||
def fix (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) : {a : α // a = f a} :=
|
||||
doStep f hf (height (α := α) + 1) (RelSeries.singleton _ (FiniteHeightLattice.bot α))
|
||||
(by simp)
|
||||
(by simpa [RelSeries.last_singleton] using fh.bot_le (f fh.bot))
|
||||
(by simpa [RelSeries.last_singleton]
|
||||
using FiniteHeightLattice.bot_le α (f (FiniteHeightLattice.bot α)))
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `aᶠ`. -/
|
||||
def aFix (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) : α :=
|
||||
(fix fh f hf).1
|
||||
def aFix (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) : α :=
|
||||
(fix f hf).1
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `aᶠ≈faᶠ`. -/
|
||||
theorem aFix_eq (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) :
|
||||
aFix fh f hf = f (aFix fh f hf) :=
|
||||
(fix fh f hf).2
|
||||
theorem aFix_eq (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f) :
|
||||
aFix f hf = f (aFix f hf) :=
|
||||
(fix f hf).2
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `stepPreservesLess` — iteration stays below any fixed point. -/
|
||||
theorem doStep_le (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f)
|
||||
theorem doStep_le (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f)
|
||||
{b : α} (hb : b = f b) :
|
||||
∀ (g : ℕ) (c : LTSeries α) (hlen : c.length + g = h + 1)
|
||||
∀ (g : ℕ) (c : LTSeries α) (hlen : c.length + g = height (α := α) + 1)
|
||||
(hle : c.last ≤ f c.last), c.last ≤ b →
|
||||
(doStep fh f hf g c hlen hle : α) ≤ b
|
||||
| 0, c, hlen, _ => fun _ => absurd (fh.bounded c) (by omega)
|
||||
(doStep f hf g c hlen hle : α) ≤ b
|
||||
| 0, c, hlen, _ => fun _ => absurd ((fixedHeight (α := α)).bounded c) (by omega)
|
||||
| g + 1, c, hlen, hle => fun hcb => by
|
||||
rw [doStep]
|
||||
split
|
||||
· exact hcb
|
||||
· exact doStep_le fh f hf hb g _ _ _
|
||||
· exact doStep_le f hf hb g _ _ _
|
||||
(by rw [RelSeries.last_snoc]; exact le_of_le_of_eq (hf hcb) hb.symm)
|
||||
|
||||
/-- Agda: `aᶠ≼` — `aFix` is below every fixed point of `f`. -/
|
||||
theorem aFix_le (fh : FixedHeight α h) (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f)
|
||||
{a : α} (ha : a = f a) : aFix fh f hf ≤ a :=
|
||||
doStep_le fh f hf ha _ _ _ _ (by simpa using fh.bot_le a)
|
||||
theorem aFix_le (f : α → α) (hf : Monotone f)
|
||||
{a : α} (ha : a = f a) : aFix f hf ≤ a :=
|
||||
doStep_le f hf ha _ _ _ _ (by simpa using FiniteHeightLattice.bot_le α a)
|
||||
|
||||
end Spa.Fixedpoint
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user