Files
agda-spa/lean/Spa/Lattice/FiniteMap.lean
Danila Fedorin 781d7947e0 Lean migration: Phase 4 (IterProd + FiniteMap lattices)
- Spa.Lattice.IterProd: k-fold product, recursive Lattice instance,
  fixed height k*hA + hB, bot = build of bottoms
- Spa.Lattice.FiniteMap: spine-pinned assoc lists ({l // l.map fst = ks});
  with = the 1100-line Map.agda collapses into positional 'combine'.
  Same lemma inventory (membership, locate, updating, GeneralizedUpdate,
  valuesAt, Provenance-union, le_of_mem_mem) — Nodup is now an explicit
  hypothesis where the Agda Map carried it intrinsically. Fixed height
  |ks|*hB still via transport along the IterProd isomorphism, which no
  longer needs Unique ks (representation is canonical).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-09 19:12:39 -07:00

667 lines
26 KiB
Lean4
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/-
Port of `Lattice/FiniteMap.agda` (and the parts of `Lattice/Map.agda` it was
built on).
Representation change enabled by dropping the setoid: a finite map over a
*fixed* key list `ks` is an association list whose key spine is *exactly* `ks`:
FiniteMap A B ks := { l : List (A × B) // l.map Prod.fst = ks }
Since the spine (including order) is pinned by the type, the representation is
canonical and propositional equality coincides with the Agda `_≈_` (pointwise
value equality). The 1100-line `Lattice/Map.agda` — whose unordered-keys
union/intersection and `Provenance` machinery existed to make `_≈_` workable —
collapses into the positional `combine` below.
Correspondence (Agda ↦ Lean):
FiniteMap, _≈_, ≈-Decidable ↦ FiniteMap, `=`, DecidableEq instance
_⊔_/_⊓_ (via Map union/inter) ↦ Max/Min via `combine`
isUnionSemilattice,
isIntersectSemilattice,
isLattice, lattice ↦ instance Lattice (FiniteMap A B ks) (Lattice.mk',
i.e. the same "two semilattices + absorption" data)
_∈_, _∈k_, ∈k-dec, forget ↦ Membership instance, MemKey (+ Decidable),
mem_key_of_mem
locate ↦ locate (computable)
all-equal-keys ↦ spine_eq
∈k-exclusive ↦ immediate from memKey_iff (both sides ↔ k ∈ ks)
m₁≼m₂⇒m₁[k]≼m₂[k] ↦ le_of_mem_mem (takes `ks.Nodup`; the Agda Map
carried key-uniqueness intrinsically)
m₁≈m₂⇒k∈m₁⇒k∈km₂⇒v₁≈v₂ ↦ trivial with `=` (congruence)
_updating_via_ + Map lemmas:
updating-via-keys-≡ ↦ (the `property` field of `updating`)
updating-via-∈k-forward ↦ memKey_updating
updating-via-k∈ks ↦ mem_updating
updating-via-k∈ks-≡ ↦ eq_of_mem_updating
updating-via-k∉ks-forward ↦ mem_updating_of_not_mem
updating-via-k∉ks-backward ↦ mem_of_mem_updating
f'-Monotonic (Map) ↦ updating_mono
GeneralizedUpdate:
f' ↦ generalizedUpdate
f'-Monotonic ↦ generalizedUpdate_monotone
f'-∈k-forward ↦ generalizedUpdate_memKey
f'-k∈ks ↦ generalizedUpdate_mem
f'-k∈ks-≡ ↦ generalizedUpdate_mem_eq
f'-k∉ks-forward, -backward ↦ generalizedUpdate_not_mem_forward, _backward
_[_], []-∈ ↦ valuesAt, mem_valuesAt (takes `ks.Nodup`)
m₁≼m₂⇒m₁[ks]≼m₂[ks] ↦ valuesAt_le
Provenance-union ↦ mem_sup
-combines ↦ (omitted: only used inside the Agda
isomorphism proofs, which simplified away)
IterProdIsomorphism.from/to ↦ toIter / ofIter — no `Unique ks` needed: the
spine-pinned representation is already
canonical, so the isomorphism is exact
from/to-preserves-≈, --distr ↦ toIter_monotone / ofIter_monotone (with `≼`
being `≤`, the transport interface consumes
monotonicity directly)
from-to-inverseˡ/ʳ ↦ toIter_ofIter / ofIter_toIter
to-build ↦ mem_ofIter_build
FixedHeight.fixedHeight ↦ FiniteMap.fixedHeight (still obtained by
transport along the IterProd isomorphism)
-contains-bottoms ↦ bot_contains_bots
-/
import Spa.Lattice.IterProd
import Spa.Isomorphism
namespace Spa
/-- Agda: `FiniteMap = Σ Map (λ m → Map.keys m ≡ ks)`. -/
def FiniteMap (A B : Type*) (ks : List A) : Type _ :=
{ l : List (A × B) // l.map Prod.fst = ks }
namespace FiniteMap
variable {A B : Type*} {ks : List A}
instance [DecidableEq A] [DecidableEq B] : DecidableEq (FiniteMap A B ks) :=
fun a b => decidable_of_iff (a.val = b.val) Subtype.ext_iff.symm
/-- Agda: `all-equal-keys`. -/
theorem spine_eq (fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks) :
fm₁.val.map Prod.fst = fm₂.val.map Prod.fst :=
fm₁.property.trans fm₂.property.symm
/-! ### The lattice structure (`combine` replaces Map union/intersection) -/
/-- Positional combination of two maps with equal spines. -/
def combine (f : B B B) (l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)) : List (A × B) :=
List.zipWith (fun p q => (p.1, f p.2 q.2)) l₁ l₂
theorem combine_spine (f : B B B) : {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)},
l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
(combine f l₁ l₂).map Prod.fst = l₁.map Prod.fst
| [], [], _ => rfl
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons, List.map_cons]
exact congrArg _ (combine_spine f h.2)
| [], _ :: _, h => by simp at h
| _ :: _, [], h => by simp at h
theorem combine_comm (f : B B B) (hf : a b, f a b = f b a) :
{l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)}, l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
combine f l₁ l₂ = combine f l₂ l₁
| [], [], _ => rfl
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons]
rw [h.1, hf]
exact congrArg _ (combine_comm f hf h.2)
| [], _ :: _, h => by simp at h
| _ :: _, [], h => by simp at h
theorem combine_assoc (f : B B B) (hf : a b c, f (f a b) c = f a (f b c)) :
{l₁ l₂ l₃ : List (A × B)},
l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst l₂.map Prod.fst = l₃.map Prod.fst
combine f (combine f l₁ l₂) l₃ = combine f l₁ (combine f l₂ l₃)
| [], [], [], _, _ => rfl
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, r :: l₃, h₁₂, h₂₃ => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h₁₂ h₂₃
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons]
rw [hf]
exact congrArg _ (combine_assoc f hf h₁₂.2 h₂₃.2)
| [], [], _ :: _, _, h => by simp at h
| [], _ :: _, _, h, _ => by simp at h
| _ :: _, [], _, h, _ => by simp at h
| _ :: _, _ :: _, [], _, h => by simp at h
theorem combine_absorb (f g : B B B) (hfg : a b, f a (g a b) = a) :
{l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)}, l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
combine f l₁ (combine g l₁ l₂) = l₁
| [], [], _ => rfl
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons, hfg]
exact congrArg _ (combine_absorb f g hfg h.2)
| [], _ :: _, h => by simp at h
| _ :: _, [], h => by simp at h
variable [Lattice B]
instance : Max (FiniteMap A B ks) where
max fm₁ fm₂ :=
combine (· ·) fm₁.val fm₂.val,
(combine_spine _ (spine_eq fm₁ fm₂)).trans fm₁.property
instance : Min (FiniteMap A B ks) where
min fm₁ fm₂ :=
combine (· ·) fm₁.val fm₂.val,
(combine_spine _ (spine_eq fm₁ fm₂)).trans fm₁.property
@[simp] theorem sup_val (fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks) :
(fm₁ fm₂).val = combine (· ·) fm₁.val fm₂.val := rfl
@[simp] theorem inf_val (fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks) :
(fm₁ fm₂).val = combine (· ·) fm₁.val fm₂.val := rfl
/-- Agda: `isLattice`/`lattice` (built like the Agda record from the two
semilattices plus absorption; `Lattice.mk'` defines `a ≤ b ↔ a ⊔ b = b`). -/
instance : Lattice (FiniteMap A B ks) :=
Lattice.mk'
(fun a b => Subtype.ext (combine_comm _ sup_comm (spine_eq a b)))
(fun a b c => Subtype.ext (combine_assoc _ sup_assoc (spine_eq a b) (spine_eq b c)))
(fun a b => Subtype.ext (combine_comm _ inf_comm (spine_eq a b)))
(fun a b c => Subtype.ext (combine_assoc _ inf_assoc (spine_eq a b) (spine_eq b c)))
(fun a b => Subtype.ext (combine_absorb _ _ (fun _ _ => sup_inf_self) (spine_eq a b)))
(fun a b => Subtype.ext (combine_absorb _ _ (fun _ _ => inf_sup_self) (spine_eq a b)))
/-! ### Membership -/
instance : Membership (A × B) (FiniteMap A B ks) :=
fun fm p => p fm.val
omit [Lattice B] in
theorem mem_def {p : A × B} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} : p fm p fm.val :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Agda: `_∈k_`. -/
def MemKey (k : A) (fm : FiniteMap A B ks) : Prop :=
k fm.val.map Prod.fst
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- A key is in the map iff it is in the (fixed) key list
(Agda: `∈k-exclusive` becomes a special case). -/
theorem memKey_iff {k : A} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} : MemKey k fm k ks := by
rw [MemKey, fm.property]
/-- Agda: `∈k-dec`. -/
instance {k : A} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} [DecidableEq A] :
Decidable (MemKey k fm) :=
decidable_of_iff _ memKey_iff.symm
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `forget`. -/
theorem mem_key_of_mem {k : A} {v : B} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks}
(h : (k, v) fm) : MemKey k fm :=
List.mem_map_of_mem _ h
section Locate
variable [DecidableEq A]
private def locateList (k : A) :
(l : List (A × B)) k l.map Prod.fst {v : B // (k, v) l}
| [], h => absurd h (by simp)
| p :: l', h =>
if heq : p.1 = k then
p.2, by rw [ heq]; exact List.mem_cons_self ..
else
let v, hv := locateList k l' (by
rcases List.mem_cons.mp h with h' | h'
· exact absurd h'.symm heq
· exact h')
v, List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv
/-- Agda: `locate`. -/
def locate {k : A} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} (h : MemKey k fm) :
{v : B // (k, v) fm} :=
locateList k fm.val h
end Locate
/-! ### The pointwise order -/
theorem combine_eq_right_iff : {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)},
l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
(combine (· ·) l₁ l₂ = l₂
List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) l₁ l₂)
| [], [], _ => by simp [combine]
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons, List.cons.injEq,
List.forall_cons, Prod.ext_iff]
rw [show List.zipWith (fun p q : A × B => (p.1, p.2 q.2)) l₁ l₂
= combine (· ·) l₁ l₂ from rfl,
combine_eq_right_iff h.2]
constructor
· rintro hk, hv, hrest
exact hk, sup_eq_right.mp hv, hrest
· rintro hk, hv, hrest
exact hk, sup_eq_right.mpr hv, hrest
| [], _ :: _, h => by simp at h
| _ :: _, [], h => by simp at h
/-- The order on finite maps is the pointwise order on values. -/
theorem le_iff {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks} :
fm₁ fm₂
List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) fm₁.val fm₂.val := by
rw [ sup_eq_right, combine_eq_right_iff (spine_eq fm₁ fm₂), Subtype.ext_iff,
sup_val]
private theorem forall_spine : {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)},
List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) l₁ l₂
l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
| _, _, List.Forall₂.nil => rfl
| _, _, List.Forall₂.cons hpq hrest => by
simp [List.map_cons, hpq.1, forall_spine hrest]
private theorem forall_mem_mem {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)}
(hf : List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) l₁ l₂) :
(l₁.map Prod.fst).Nodup
{k : A} {v₁ v₂ : B}, (k, v₁) l₁ (k, v₂) l₂ v₁ v₂ := by
induction hf with
| nil =>
intro _ k v₁ v₂ h₁ _
simp at h₁
| @cons p q l₁' l₂' hpq hrest ih =>
intro hnd k v₁ v₂ h₁ h₂
simp only [List.map_cons, List.nodup_cons] at hnd
have hspine := forall_spine hrest
rcases List.mem_cons.mp h₁ with heq₁ | h₁'
· rcases List.mem_cons.mp h₂ with heq₂ | h₂'
· rw [ heq₁, heq₂] at hpq
exact hpq.2
· exfalso
apply hnd.1
rw [show p.1 = k from (congrArg Prod.fst heq₁).symm, hspine]
exact List.mem_map_of_mem _ h₂'
· rcases List.mem_cons.mp h₂ with heq₂ | h₂'
· exfalso
apply hnd.1
rw [hpq.1, show q.1 = k from (congrArg Prod.fst heq₂).symm]
exact List.mem_map_of_mem _ h₁'
· exact ih hnd.2 h₁' h₂'
/-- Agda: `m₁≼m₂⇒m₁[k]≼m₂[k]`. The `Nodup` hypothesis was carried inside the
Agda `Map` type. -/
theorem le_of_mem_mem (hks : ks.Nodup) {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks}
(hle : fm₁ fm₂) {k : A} {v₁ v₂ : B}
(h₁ : (k, v₁) fm₁) (h₂ : (k, v₂) fm₂) : v₁ v₂ :=
forall_mem_mem (le_iff.mp hle) (fm₁.property.symm hks) h₁ h₂
/-! ### Provenance of joined values -/
omit [Lattice B] in
private theorem mem_combine (f : B B B) : {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)} {k : A} {v : B},
l₁.map Prod.fst = l₂.map Prod.fst
(k, v) combine f l₁ l₂
v₁ v₂, v = f v₁ v₂ (k, v₁) l₁ (k, v₂) l₂
| [], [], _, _, _, h => by simp [combine] at h
| p :: l₁, q :: l₂, k, v, hsp, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at hsp
simp only [combine, List.zipWith_cons_cons] at h
rcases List.mem_cons.mp h with heq | h'
· injection heq with hk hv
exact p.2, q.2, hv,
by rw [hk]; simp,
by rw [hk, hsp.1]; simp
· obtain v₁, v₂, hv, h₁, h₂ := mem_combine f hsp.2 h'
exact v₁, v₂, hv, List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h₁, List.mem_cons_of_mem _ h₂
/-- Agda: `Provenance-union` — a binding of a join comes from bindings of both
maps. -/
theorem mem_sup {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks} {k : A} {v : B}
(h : (k, v) fm₁ fm₂) :
v₁ v₂, v = v₁ v₂ (k, v₁) fm₁ (k, v₂) fm₂ :=
mem_combine _ (spine_eq fm₁ fm₂) h
/-! ### Updating (Agda: `_updating_via_` and `GeneralizedUpdate`) -/
section Updating
variable [DecidableEq A]
/-- Agda: `_updating_via_` — for each key in `ks'`, replace its value by `g k`. -/
def updating (fm : FiniteMap A B ks) (ks' : List A) (g : A B) :
FiniteMap A B ks :=
fm.val.map (fun p => if p.1 ks' then (p.1, g p.1) else p), by
rw [List.map_map,
show (Prod.fst fun p : A × B => if p.1 ks' then (p.1, g p.1) else p)
= Prod.fst from funext fun p => by by_cases h : p.1 ks' <;> simp [h]]
exact fm.property
omit [Lattice B] in
@[simp] theorem updating_val (fm : FiniteMap A B ks) (ks' : List A) (g : A B) :
(updating fm ks' g).val
= fm.val.map (fun p => if p.1 ks' then (p.1, g p.1) else p) := rfl
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `updating-via-∈k-forward` (strengthened to an iff). -/
theorem memKey_updating {k : A} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} {ks' : List A} {g : A B} :
MemKey k (updating fm ks' g) MemKey k fm := by
rw [memKey_iff, memKey_iff]
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `updating-via-k∈ks-≡`. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_updating {k : A} {v : B} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks}
{ks' : List A} {g : A B} (hk : k ks')
(h : (k, v) updating fm ks' g) : v = g k := by
obtain p, hp, heq := List.mem_map.mp h
by_cases hmem : p.1 ks'
· rw [if_pos hmem] at heq
injection heq with h1 h2
rw [ h2, h1]
· rw [if_neg hmem] at heq
rw [heq] at hmem
exact absurd hk hmem
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `updating-via-k∈ks`. -/
theorem mem_updating {k : A} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} {ks' : List A} {g : A B}
(hk : k ks') (hmem : MemKey k fm) : (k, g k) updating fm ks' g := by
obtain v, hv := locate hmem
exact List.mem_map.mpr (k, v), hv, by simp [hk]
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `updating-via-k∉ks-forward`. -/
theorem mem_updating_of_not_mem {k : A} {v : B} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks}
{ks' : List A} {g : A B} (hk : k ks') (h : (k, v) fm) :
(k, v) updating fm ks' g :=
List.mem_map.mpr (k, v), h, by simp [hk]
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `updating-via-k∉ks-backward`. -/
theorem mem_of_mem_updating {k : A} {v : B} {fm : FiniteMap A B ks}
{ks' : List A} {g : A B} (hk : k ks')
(h : (k, v) updating fm ks' g) : (k, v) fm := by
obtain p, hp, heq := List.mem_map.mp h
by_cases hmem : p.1 ks'
· rw [if_pos hmem] at heq
injection heq with h1 _
rw [ h1] at hk
exact absurd hmem hk
· rw [if_neg hmem] at heq
exact heq hp
private theorem updating_mono_list {ks' : List A} {g₁ g₂ : A B}
(hg : k, g₁ k g₂ k) {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)}
(hl : List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) l₁ l₂) :
List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2)
(l₁.map fun p => if p.1 ks' then (p.1, g₁ p.1) else p)
(l₂.map fun p => if p.1 ks' then (p.1, g₂ p.1) else p) := by
induction hl with
| nil => exact List.Forall₂.nil
| @cons x y l₁' l₂' hpq hrest ih =>
simp only [List.map_cons]
refine List.Forall₂.cons ?_ ih
obtain hk, hv := hpq
by_cases h : x.1 ks'
· rw [if_pos h, if_pos (hk h)]
exact hk, hk hg x.1
· rw [if_neg h, if_neg (fun hy => h (hk.symm hy))]
exact hk, hv
/-- Agda: `f'-Monotonic` at the `Map` level. -/
theorem updating_mono {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks} {ks' : List A}
{g₁ g₂ : A B} (hfm : fm₁ fm₂) (hg : k, g₁ k g₂ k) :
updating fm₁ ks' g₁ updating fm₂ ks' g₂ := by
rw [le_iff] at hfm
simp only [updating_val]
exact updating_mono_list hg hfm
end Updating
section GeneralizedUpdate
/-! Agda: `GeneralizedUpdate` (the "Exercise 4.26" construction). -/
variable [DecidableEq A] {L : Type*} [Lattice L]
/-- Agda: `GeneralizedUpdate.f'`. -/
def generalizedUpdate (f : L FiniteMap A B ks) (g : A L B)
(ks' : List A) (l : L) : FiniteMap A B ks :=
(f l).updating ks' (fun k => g k l)
variable {f : L FiniteMap A B ks} {g : A L B} {ks' : List A}
/-- Agda: `f'-Monotonic`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_monotone (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : k, Monotone (g k)) : Monotone (generalizedUpdate f g ks') :=
fun _ _ hl => updating_mono (hf hl) (fun k => hg k hl)
omit [Lattice B] [Lattice L] in
/-- Agda: `f'-∈k-forward`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_memKey {k : A} {l : L}
(h : MemKey k (f l)) : MemKey k (generalizedUpdate f g ks' l) := by
unfold generalizedUpdate
exact memKey_updating.mpr h
omit [Lattice B] [Lattice L] in
/-- Agda: `f'-k∈ks`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_mem {k : A} {l : L} (hk : k ks')
(h : MemKey k (f l)) : (k, g k l) generalizedUpdate f g ks' l := by
unfold generalizedUpdate
exact mem_updating hk h
omit [Lattice B] [Lattice L] in
/-- Agda: `f'-k∈ks-≡`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_mem_eq {k : A} {v : B} {l : L} (hk : k ks')
(h : (k, v) generalizedUpdate f g ks' l) : v = g k l := by
unfold generalizedUpdate at h
exact eq_of_mem_updating (g := fun k => g k l) hk h
omit [Lattice B] [Lattice L] in
/-- Agda: `f'-k∉ks-forward`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_not_mem_forward {k : A} {v : B} {l : L} (hk : k ks')
(h : (k, v) f l) : (k, v) generalizedUpdate f g ks' l := by
unfold generalizedUpdate
exact mem_updating_of_not_mem hk h
omit [Lattice B] [Lattice L] in
/-- Agda: `f'-k∉ks-backward`. -/
theorem generalizedUpdate_not_mem_backward {k : A} {v : B} {l : L} (hk : k ks')
(h : (k, v) generalizedUpdate f g ks' l) : (k, v) f l := by
unfold generalizedUpdate at h
exact mem_of_mem_updating hk h
end GeneralizedUpdate
/-! ### Reading off values at a list of keys (Agda: `_[_]`) -/
section ValuesAt
variable [DecidableEq A]
private def lookup? (k : A) : List (A × B) Option B
| [] => none
| p :: l' => if p.1 = k then some p.2 else lookup? k l'
/-- Agda: `_[_]`. -/
def valuesAt (fm : FiniteMap A B ks) (ks' : List A) : List B :=
ks'.filterMap (fun k => lookup? k fm.val)
omit [Lattice B] in
private theorem lookup?_eq_some_of_mem : {l : List (A × B)},
(l.map Prod.fst).Nodup {k : A} {v : B}, (k, v) l
lookup? k l = some v
| [], _, _, _, h => by simp at h
| p :: l', hnd, k, v, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.nodup_cons] at hnd
rcases List.mem_cons.mp h with heq | h'
· rw [ heq]
simp [lookup?]
· rw [lookup?, if_neg ?_]
· exact lookup?_eq_some_of_mem hnd.2 h'
· intro hpk
subst hpk
have := List.mem_map_of_mem Prod.fst h'
exact hnd.1 this
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `[]-∈`. -/
theorem mem_valuesAt (hks : ks.Nodup) {fm : FiniteMap A B ks} {k : A} {v : B}
{ks' : List A} (hk : k ks') (h : (k, v) fm) : v valuesAt fm ks' :=
List.mem_filterMap.mpr
k, hk, lookup?_eq_some_of_mem (fm.property.symm hks) h
private theorem lookup?_forall₂ {l₁ l₂ : List (A × B)}
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun p q : A × B => p.1 = q.1 p.2 q.2) l₁ l₂) (k : A) :
Option.Rel (· ·) (lookup? k l₁) (lookup? k l₂) := by
induction h with
| nil => exact Option.Rel.none
| @cons p q l₁ l₂ hpq hrest ih =>
rw [lookup?, lookup?]
by_cases hc : q.1 = k
· rw [if_pos hc, if_pos (hpq.1.trans hc)]
exact Option.Rel.some hpq.2
· rw [if_neg hc, if_neg (fun hp => hc (hpq.1 hp))]
exact ih
/-- Agda: `m₁≼m₂⇒m₁[ks]≼m₂[ks]`. -/
theorem valuesAt_le {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B ks} (hle : fm₁ fm₂)
(ks' : List A) :
List.Forall₂ (· ·) (valuesAt fm₁ ks') (valuesAt fm₂ ks') := by
induction ks' with
| nil => exact List.Forall₂.nil
| cons k ks'' ih =>
have hrel := lookup?_forall₂ (le_iff.mp hle) k
rw [valuesAt, valuesAt, List.filterMap_cons, List.filterMap_cons]
revert hrel
generalize lookup? k fm₁.val = o₁
generalize lookup? k fm₂.val = o₂
intro hrel
cases hrel with
| none => simpa [valuesAt] using ih
| some hv => exact List.Forall₂.cons hv (by simpa [valuesAt] using ih)
end ValuesAt
/-! ### The isomorphism with `IterProd` and the fixed height -/
section Iso
omit [Lattice B] in
theorem val_ne_nil {k : A} {ks' : List A} (fm : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks')) :
fm.val [] := fun h => by
have hp := fm.property
rw [h] at hp
simp at hp
def headVal {k : A} {ks' : List A} : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks') B
| [], h => absurd h (by simp)
| p :: _, _ => p.2
/-- Agda: `pop`. -/
def pop {k : A} {ks' : List A} : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks') FiniteMap A B ks'
| [], h => absurd h (by simp)
| _ :: l, h =>
l, by simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h; exact h.2
omit [Lattice B] in
theorem val_eq_cons {k : A} {ks' : List A} :
fm : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks'), fm.val = (k, fm.headVal) :: fm.pop.val
| [], h => absurd h (by simp)
| p :: l, h => by
simp only [List.map_cons, List.cons.injEq] at h
simp [headVal, pop, h.1]
/-- Agda: `IterProdIsomorphism.from`. -/
def toIter : {ks : List A} FiniteMap A B ks IterProd B PUnit ks.length
| [], _ => PUnit.unit
| _ :: _, fm => (fm.headVal, toIter fm.pop)
/-- Agda: `IterProdIsomorphism.to` (no `Unique ks` needed: the spine-pinned
representation is canonical). -/
def ofIter : (ks : List A) IterProd B PUnit ks.length FiniteMap A B ks
| [], _ => [], rfl
| k :: ks', ip =>
(k, ip.1) :: (ofIter ks' ip.2).val, by
simp [(ofIter ks' ip.2).property]
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `from-to-inverseʳ`. -/
theorem ofIter_toIter : {ks : List A} (fm : FiniteMap A B ks),
ofIter ks (toIter fm) = fm
| [], fm => by
obtain val, hprop := fm
cases val with
| nil => rfl
| cons p l => exact absurd hprop (by simp)
| k :: ks', fm => Subtype.ext (by
show (k, fm.headVal) :: (ofIter ks' (toIter fm.pop)).val = fm.val
rw [ofIter_toIter fm.pop, val_eq_cons fm])
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `from-to-inverseˡ`. -/
theorem toIter_ofIter : (ks : List A) (ip : IterProd B PUnit ks.length),
toIter (ofIter ks ip) = ip
| [], _ => rfl
| k :: ks', ip => by
show (headVal (ofIter (k :: ks') ip), toIter (pop (ofIter (k :: ks') ip))) = ip
rw [show pop (ofIter (k :: ks') ip) = ofIter ks' ip.2 from rfl,
toIter_ofIter ks' ip.2]
rfl
theorem headVal_le {k : A} {ks' : List A} {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks')}
(h : fm₁ fm₂) : fm₁.headVal fm₂.headVal := by
have h' := le_iff.mp h
rw [val_eq_cons fm₁, val_eq_cons fm₂] at h'
exact (List.forall_cons.mp h').1.2
theorem pop_le {k : A} {ks' : List A} {fm₁ fm₂ : FiniteMap A B (k :: ks')}
(h : fm₁ fm₂) : fm₁.pop fm₂.pop := by
rw [le_iff]
have h' := le_iff.mp h
rw [val_eq_cons fm₁, val_eq_cons fm₂] at h'
exact (List.forall_cons.mp h').2
/-- Agda: `from-preserves-≈` and `from--distr` (see header note). -/
theorem toIter_monotone : {ks : List A},
Monotone (toIter : FiniteMap A B ks IterProd B PUnit ks.length)
| [] => fun _ _ _ => le_refl _
| _ :: _ => fun _ _ h =>
Prod.mk_le_mk.mpr headVal_le h, toIter_monotone (pop_le h)
/-- Agda: `to-preserves-≈` and `to--distr` (see header note). -/
theorem ofIter_monotone : (ks : List A), Monotone (ofIter (A := A) (B := B) ks)
| [] => fun _ _ _ => le_refl _
| k :: ks' => fun ip₁ ip₂ h => by
rw [le_iff]
show List.Forall₂ _ ((k, ip₁.1) :: (ofIter ks' ip₁.2).val)
((k, ip₂.1) :: (ofIter ks' ip₂.2).val)
exact List.Forall₂.cons rfl, h.1 (le_iff.mp (ofIter_monotone ks' h.2))
/-- Agda: `FixedHeight.fixedHeight` — a finite map into a lattice of height
`hB` has height `|ks| · hB`, by transport along the `IterProd` isomorphism. -/
def fixedHeight {hB : } (fhB : FixedHeight B hB) (ks : List A) :
FixedHeight (FiniteMap A B ks) (ks.length * hB) :=
((IterProd.fixedHeight fhB punitFixedHeight ks.length).transport
(ofIter ks) toIter (ofIter_monotone ks) toIter_monotone
(toIter_ofIter ks) (fun fm => ofIter_toIter fm)).cast (by ring)
omit [Lattice B] in
/-- Agda: `to-build`. -/
theorem mem_ofIter_build {b : B} : {ks : List A} {k : A} {v : B},
(k, v) ofIter ks (IterProd.build b PUnit.unit ks.length) v = b
| [], _, _, h => by simp [ofIter, mem_def] at h
| k' :: ks', k, v, h => by
rcases List.mem_cons.mp h with heq | h'
· exact (Prod.ext_iff.mp heq).2
· exact mem_ofIter_build h'
/-- Agda: `⊥-contains-bottoms`. -/
theorem bot_contains_bots {hB : } (fhB : FixedHeight B hB) {k : A} {v : B}
(h : (k, v) (fixedHeight fhB ks).bot) : v = fhB.bot := by
have hbot : (fixedHeight fhB ks).bot
= ofIter ks (IterProd.build fhB.bot PUnit.unit ks.length) := by
show ofIter ks (IterProd.fixedHeight fhB punitFixedHeight ks.length).bot = _
rw [IterProd.bot_fixedHeight]
rw [hbot] at h
exact mem_ofIter_build h
end Iso
end FiniteMap
end Spa