This makes a finite-height proof for any `Fin n -> a` lattice immediate, and precludes the need for IterProd and Prod altogether. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
173 lines
6.6 KiB
Lean4
173 lines
6.6 KiB
Lean4
import Spa.Lattice
|
||
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
|
||
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
|
||
|
||
/-!
|
||
|
||
# Finite Tuple Lattices
|
||
|
||
This file provides a proof that, in addition to being a lattice, the function
|
||
space `Fin n → β` is itself a `Spa.FiniteHeightLattice` if the element type
|
||
`β` is a lattice.
|
||
|
||
Finite tuple lattices are the workhorse behind `FiniteMap`, whose carrier is
|
||
`Fin ks.length → β`.
|
||
|
||
The proof proceeds by "unzipping" a chain (`LTSeries`):
|
||
|
||
$$
|
||
(a_1, b_1, c_1) < \ldots < (a_1, b_1, c_o) < \ldots < (a_1, b_m, c_o) <
|
||
\ldots < (a_n, b_m, c_o)
|
||
$$
|
||
|
||
In which, at each step, at least one of the components must have increased
|
||
(otherwise, the chain is not striclty increasing), into `n` chains
|
||
(`LTSeries`).
|
||
|
||
$$
|
||
\begin{aligned}
|
||
a_1 < \ldots < a_n \\
|
||
b_1 < \ldots < b_m \
|
||
c_1 < \ldots < c_o \
|
||
\end{aligned}
|
||
$$
|
||
|
||
Because at least one of the two "unzipped" chains grows with each element of
|
||
the product chain, the full chain length can't exceed the sum of the
|
||
components. By the definition of finite height, these two chains are bounded,
|
||
and therefore, the product chain is bounded too. -/
|
||
|
||
namespace Spa
|
||
|
||
namespace Tuple
|
||
|
||
variable {β : Type*}
|
||
|
||
section Unzip
|
||
|
||
variable [PartialOrder β]
|
||
|
||
open Classical in -- chain bounds are in Prop, so classical helps here.
|
||
/-- The generalized unzip: any chain in `Fin n → β` decomposes into a family of
|
||
per-tuple-coordinate chains in `β`, agreeing with the original at each end, whose
|
||
lengths sum to an upper bound on the original chain's length. -/
|
||
lemma exists_unzip {n : ℕ} (c : LTSeries (Fin n → β)) :
|
||
∃ cs : Fin n → LTSeries β,
|
||
(∀ i, (cs i).head = c.head i) ∧ (∀ i, (cs i).last = c.last i) ∧
|
||
c.length ≤ ∑ i, (cs i).length := by
|
||
suffices H : ∀ (m : ℕ) (c : LTSeries (Fin n → β)), c.length = m →
|
||
∃ cs : Fin n → LTSeries β,
|
||
(∀ i, (cs i).head = c.head i) ∧ (∀ i, (cs i).last = c.last i) ∧
|
||
c.length ≤ ∑ i, (cs i).length from H c.length c rfl
|
||
intro m
|
||
induction m with
|
||
| zero =>
|
||
intro c hn
|
||
have hlast : (Fin.last c.length) = 0 := by ext; simp [hn]
|
||
have hhl : c.last = c.head := by rw [RelSeries.last, RelSeries.head, hlast]
|
||
refine ⟨fun i => RelSeries.singleton _ (c.head i), fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
|
||
· exact RelSeries.head_singleton _
|
||
· rw [RelSeries.last_singleton, hhl]
|
||
· simp [hn, RelSeries.singleton]
|
||
| succ m ih =>
|
||
intro c hn
|
||
have h0 : c.length ≠ 0 := by omega
|
||
haveI : NeZero c.length := ⟨h0⟩
|
||
obtain ⟨cs', hh', hl', hlen'⟩ := ih (c.tail h0) (by rw [RelSeries.tail_length]; omega)
|
||
have hstep : c.head < c 1 := c.strictMono Fin.one_pos'
|
||
obtain ⟨hle, j, hjlt⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp hstep
|
||
have hh'1 : ∀ i, (cs' i).head = c 1 i := fun i => by rw [hh' i, RelSeries.head_tail]
|
||
refine ⟨fun i =>
|
||
if hlt : c.head i < c 1 i then
|
||
(cs' i).cons (c.head i) (by rw [hh'1 i]; exact hlt)
|
||
else cs' i,
|
||
fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_, ?_⟩
|
||
· by_cases hlt : c.head i < c 1 i
|
||
· simp only [dif_pos hlt, RelSeries.head_cons]
|
||
· simp only [dif_neg hlt]
|
||
rw [hh'1 i]
|
||
exact ((lt_or_eq_of_le (hle i)).resolve_left hlt).symm
|
||
· by_cases hlt : c.head i < c 1 i
|
||
· simp only [dif_pos hlt, RelSeries.last_cons, hl' i, RelSeries.last_tail]
|
||
· simp only [dif_neg hlt, hl' i, RelSeries.last_tail]
|
||
· calc c.length
|
||
= (c.tail h0).length + 1 := by rw [RelSeries.tail_length]; omega
|
||
_ ≤ (∑ i, (cs' i).length) + 1 := Nat.add_le_add_right hlen' 1
|
||
_ ≤ ∑ i, (if hlt : c.head i < c 1 i then
|
||
(cs' i).cons (c.head i) (by rw [hh'1 i]; exact hlt) else cs' i).length :=
|
||
Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Finset.sum_lt_sum (fun i _ => by
|
||
split
|
||
· rw [RelSeries.cons_length]; omega
|
||
· exact le_rfl)
|
||
⟨j, Finset.mem_univ j, by rw [dif_pos hjlt, RelSeries.cons_length]; omega⟩)
|
||
|
||
end Unzip
|
||
|
||
section FiniteHeight
|
||
|
||
variable [FiniteHeightLattice β]
|
||
|
||
private lemma consBot_strictMono {n : ℕ} :
|
||
StrictMono (fun b : β => (Fin.cons b (⊥ : Fin n → β) : Fin (n + 1) → β)) := by
|
||
intro a b hab
|
||
refine lt_iff_le_and_ne.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩
|
||
· refine Pi.le_def.mpr (fun i => Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) i)
|
||
· simpa using hab.le
|
||
· simp
|
||
· exact fun h => hab.ne (by simpa using congrFun h 0)
|
||
|
||
private lemma consTop_strictMono {n : ℕ} :
|
||
StrictMono (fun f : Fin n → β => (Fin.cons (⊤ : β) f : Fin (n + 1) → β)) := by
|
||
intro f g hfg
|
||
refine lt_iff_le_and_ne.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩
|
||
· refine Pi.le_def.mpr (fun i => Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) i)
|
||
· simp
|
||
· simpa using Pi.le_def.mp hfg.le j
|
||
· intro h
|
||
apply hfg.ne
|
||
funext j
|
||
simpa using congrFun h j.succ
|
||
|
||
/-- The maximal chain in `Fin n → β`: walk the first tuple element from `⊥` to `⊤`
|
||
through `β`'s longest chain, then do that with the second element, and so on. -/
|
||
private def stdChain : (n : ℕ) →
|
||
{ s : LTSeries (Fin n → β) //
|
||
s.head = (⊥ : Fin n → β) ∧
|
||
s.length = n * (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).length }
|
||
| 0 => ⟨RelSeries.singleton _ ⊥, by rw [RelSeries.head_singleton], by simp⟩
|
||
| n + 1 =>
|
||
let prev := stdChain n
|
||
⟨RelSeries.smash
|
||
((FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).map
|
||
(fun b => (Fin.cons b (⊥ : Fin n → β) : Fin (n + 1) → β)) consBot_strictMono)
|
||
(prev.1.map (fun f => (Fin.cons (⊤ : β) f : Fin (n + 1) → β)) consTop_strictMono)
|
||
(by rw [LTSeries.last_map, LTSeries.head_map, prev.2.1]; rfl),
|
||
by
|
||
simp only [RelSeries.head_smash, LTSeries.head_map]
|
||
rw [show (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).head = (⊥ : β) from rfl]
|
||
funext i
|
||
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) i <;> simp [Pi.bot_apply],
|
||
by
|
||
show (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).length + prev.1.length
|
||
= (n + 1) * (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).length
|
||
rw [prev.2.2, Nat.succ_mul]; exact Nat.add_comm _ _⟩
|
||
|
||
instance instFiniteHeight {n : ℕ} : FiniteHeightLattice (Fin n → β) where
|
||
toLattice := inferInstance
|
||
longestChain := (stdChain n).1
|
||
chains_bounded := fun c => by
|
||
obtain ⟨cs, _, _, hbound⟩ := exists_unzip c
|
||
refine hbound.trans ?_
|
||
rw [(stdChain n).2.2]
|
||
calc ∑ i, (cs i).length
|
||
≤ ∑ _i : Fin n, (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).length :=
|
||
Finset.sum_le_sum (fun i _ => FiniteHeightLattice.chains_bounded (cs i))
|
||
_ = n * (FiniteHeightLattice.longestChain (α := β)).length := by
|
||
simp [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, Fintype.card_fin]
|
||
|
||
end FiniteHeight
|
||
|
||
end Tuple
|
||
|
||
end Spa
|