Fix a few typos (thanks, Arthur)
This commit is contained in:
parent
97c989e465
commit
1b35ca32ac
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ deduce that \\(b-r\\) is divisible by \\(a\\) (it's literally equal to \\(a\\) t
|
||||||
so it must be divisible). Thus, we can write:
|
so it must be divisible). Thus, we can write:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{{< latex >}}
|
{{< latex >}}
|
||||||
(b-r)|a
|
a|(b-r)
|
||||||
{{< /latex >}}
|
{{< /latex >}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There's another notation for this type of statement, though. To say that the difference between
|
There's another notation for this type of statement, though. To say that the difference between
|
||||||
|
@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ The results are similarly cool:
|
||||||
### Sequences of Remainders
|
### Sequences of Remainders
|
||||||
So now we know what the digit-summing algorithm is really doing. But that algorithm isn't all there
|
So now we know what the digit-summing algorithm is really doing. But that algorithm isn't all there
|
||||||
is to it! We're repeatedly applying this algorithm over and over to multiples of another number. How
|
is to it! We're repeatedly applying this algorithm over and over to multiples of another number. How
|
||||||
does this work, and why does it always loop around? Why don't we ever spiral further and further
|
does this work, and why does it always loop around? Why don't we ever spiral farther and farther
|
||||||
from the center?
|
from the center?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
First, let's take a closer look at our sequence of multiples. Suppose we're working with multiples
|
First, let's take a closer look at our sequence of multiples. Suppose we're working with multiples
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user