Web-Projects/blog-static
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Fix a mental typo in part 2 of types series

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Danila Fedorin 2022-09-10 12:33:43 -07:00
parent 347c818ab6
commit 392b103f38
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/blog/02_types_variables.md
View File

@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ This rule is bad, and it should feel bad. Here are two reasons:
1. It only works for expressions like `x+y` or `a+b`, but not for 1. It only works for expressions like `x+y` or `a+b`, but not for
more complicated things like `(a+b)+(c+d)`. This is because more complicated things like `(a+b)+(c+d)`. This is because
by using \\(x\_1\\) and \\(x\_2\\), the metavariables for by using \\(x\_1\\) and \\(x\_2\\), the metavariables for
expressions, it rules out additions that _don't_ add expressions. variables, it rules out additions that _don't_ add variables.
2. It doesn't play well with other rules; it can't be the _only_ 2. It doesn't play well with other rules; it can't be the _only_
rule for addition of integers, since it doesn't work for rule for addition of integers, since it doesn't work for
integer literals (i.e., `1+1` is out). integer literals (i.e., `1+1` is out).