Tie up Lattices (1), and plan to write Lattices (2)
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d787548915
commit
9d31764073
|
@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ and instantiate the `AboveBelow` module:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{{< codelines "Agda" "agda-spa/Analysis/Sign.agda" 34 47 >}}
|
{{< codelines "Agda" "agda-spa/Analysis/Sign.agda" 34 47 >}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Making Lattices out of Lattices
|
### From Simple Lattices to Complex Ones
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Natural numbers and signs alone are cool enough, but they will not be sufficient
|
Natural numbers and signs alone are cool enough, but they will not be sufficient
|
||||||
to write program analyzers. That's because when we're writing an analyzer,
|
to write program analyzers. That's because when we're writing an analyzer,
|
||||||
|
@ -490,3 +490,4 @@ maps, and how do we define the \((\sqcup)\) and \((\sqcap)\) operations?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The solution turns out to be to define ways in which simpler lattices
|
The solution turns out to be to define ways in which simpler lattices
|
||||||
(like our sign) can be combined and transformed to define more complex lattices.
|
(like our sign) can be combined and transformed to define more complex lattices.
|
||||||
|
We'll move on to that in the next post of this series.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user