Do not attribute G-machine to SPJ specifically
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7a7100fea
commit
eac1151616
|
@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ there's another way.
|
||||||
We clean up after ourselves.
|
We clean up after ourselves.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Towards a Cleaner Stack
|
### Towards a Cleaner Stack
|
||||||
Simon Peyton Jones wrote his G-machine semantics in a particular way. Every time
|
The G-machine compilation rules Simon Peyton Jones presents are written in a particular way. Every time
|
||||||
that a function is called, all it leaves behind on the stack is the graph node
|
that a function is called, all it leaves behind on the stack is the graph node
|
||||||
that represents the function's output. Our own internal functions, however, have been less
|
that represents the function's output. Our own internal functions, however, have been less
|
||||||
careful. Consider, for instance, the "binary operator" function I showed you.
|
careful. Consider, for instance, the "binary operator" function I showed you.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user