Compare commits
No commits in common. "b66c58b68e9c507f47b5b9ef8fb8d85281502ffe" and "6a168f2fe144850ed3a81b796e07266cbf80f382" have entirely different histories.
b66c58b68e
...
6a168f2fe1
|
@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
title: "Integrating Agda's HTML Output with Hugo"
|
title: "Integrating Agda's HTML Output with Hugo"
|
||||||
date: 2024-05-30T00:29:26-07:00
|
date: 2024-05-25T21:02:10-07:00
|
||||||
tags: ["Agda", "Hugo", "Ruby"]
|
draft: true
|
||||||
|
tags: ["Agda", "Hugo", "Ruby", "Nix"]
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One of my favorite things about Agda are its clickable HTML pages. If you don't
|
One of my favorite things about Agda are its clickable HTML pages. If you don't
|
||||||
|
@ -36,29 +37,13 @@ And here's the denotational semantics for that expression:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Notice that you can click `Expr`, `_∪_`, `⟦`, etc.! All of this integrates
|
Notice that you can click `Expr`, `_∪_`, `⟦`, etc.! All of this integrates
|
||||||
with my existing Hugo site, and only required a little bit of additional
|
with my existing Hugo site, and only required a little bit of additional
|
||||||
metadata to make it work. The conversion is implemented as
|
metadata to make it work.
|
||||||
[a Ruby script](https://dev.danilafe.com/Web-Projects/blog-static/src/commit/04f12b545d5692a78b1a2f13ef968417c749e295/agda.rb);
|
|
||||||
this script transfers the link structure from an Agda-generated documentation
|
|
||||||
HTML file onto lightly-annotated Hugo code blocks.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To use the script, your Hugo theme (or your Markdown content) must
|
Now, the details. Right now, the solution is pretty tailored to my site
|
||||||
annotate the code blocks with several properties:
|
and workflow, but the core of the script -- a piece that transfers links
|
||||||
* `data-agda-block`, which marks code that needs to be processed.
|
from an Agda HTML file into a syntax highlighted Hugo HTML block -- should
|
||||||
* `data-file-path`, which tells the script what Agda file provided the
|
|
||||||
code in the block, and therefore what Agda HTML file should be searched
|
|
||||||
for links.
|
|
||||||
* `data-first-line` and `data-last-line`, which tell the script what
|
|
||||||
section of the Agda HTML file should be searched for said links.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Given this -- and a couple of other assumptions, such as that all Agda
|
|
||||||
projects are in a `code/<project>` folder, the script post-processes
|
|
||||||
the HTML files automatically. Right now, the solution is pretty tailored to my
|
|
||||||
site and workflow, but the core of the script -- the piece that transfers links
|
|
||||||
from an Agda HTML file into a syntax-highlighted Hugo HTML block -- should
|
|
||||||
be fairly reusable.
|
be fairly reusable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now, the details.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### The Constraints
|
### The Constraints
|
||||||
The goal was simple: to allow the code blocks on my Hugo-generated site to
|
The goal was simple: to allow the code blocks on my Hugo-generated site to
|
||||||
have links that take the user to the definition of a given symbol.
|
have links that take the user to the definition of a given symbol.
|
||||||
|
@ -107,7 +92,6 @@ I've hit all of these requirements; now it's time to dig into how I got there.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Implementation
|
### Implementation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Processing Agda's HTML Output
|
|
||||||
It's pretty much a no-go to try to resolve Agda from Hugo, or perform some
|
It's pretty much a no-go to try to resolve Agda from Hugo, or perform some
|
||||||
sort of "heuristic" to detect cross-links. Agda is a very complex programming
|
sort of "heuristic" to detect cross-links. Agda is a very complex programming
|
||||||
language, and Hugo's templating engine, though powerful, is just not
|
language, and Hugo's templating engine, though powerful, is just not
|
||||||
|
@ -126,7 +110,7 @@ with links as I discover them. Effectively, what I need to do is a "link
|
||||||
transfer": I need to identify regions of code that are highlighted in Agda's HTML,
|
transfer": I need to identify regions of code that are highlighted in Agda's HTML,
|
||||||
find those regions in Hugo's HTML output, and mark them with links. In addition,
|
find those regions in Hugo's HTML output, and mark them with links. In addition,
|
||||||
I'll need to fix up the links themselves: the HTML output assumes that each
|
I'll need to fix up the links themselves: the HTML output assumes that each
|
||||||
Agda file is its own HTML page, but this is ruled out by the second constraint of mine.
|
Agda file is its own HTML page, but this is ruled out by the second constraint.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a little visualization, the overall problems looks something like this:
|
As a little visualization, the overall problems looks something like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -151,7 +135,6 @@ What I ended up doing is translating Agda's HTML output into offsets and data
|
||||||
about the code block's _plain text_ -- the source code being decorated.
|
about the code block's _plain text_ -- the source code being decorated.
|
||||||
Both the Agda and Hugo HTML describe the same code; thus, the plain text
|
Both the Agda and Hugo HTML describe the same code; thus, the plain text
|
||||||
is the common denominator between the two.
|
is the common denominator between the two.
|
||||||
{#plain-text}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I wrote a Ruby script to extract the decorations from the Agda output; here
|
I wrote a Ruby script to extract the decorations from the Agda output; here
|
||||||
it is in slightly abridged form. You can find the [original `agda.rb` file here](https://dev.danilafe.com/Web-Projects/blog-static/src/commit/04f12b545d5692a78b1a2f13ef968417c749e295/agda.rb).
|
it is in slightly abridged form. You can find the [original `agda.rb` file here](https://dev.danilafe.com/Web-Projects/blog-static/src/commit/04f12b545d5692a78b1a2f13ef968417c749e295/agda.rb).
|
||||||
|
@ -164,7 +147,7 @@ def process_agda_html_file(file)
|
||||||
document = Nokogiri::HTML.parse(File.open(file))
|
document = Nokogiri::HTML.parse(File.open(file))
|
||||||
pre_code = document.css("pre.Agda")[0]
|
pre_code = document.css("pre.Agda")[0]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# The traversal is postorder; we always visit children before their
|
# The traversal postorder; we always visit children before their
|
||||||
# parents, and we visit leaves in sequence.
|
# parents, and we visit leaves in sequence.
|
||||||
line_infos = []
|
line_infos = []
|
||||||
offset = 0 # Column index within the current Agda source code line
|
offset = 0 # Column index within the current Agda source code line
|
||||||
|
@ -222,338 +205,52 @@ example above, the script might produce:
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Modifying Hugo's HTML
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Given such line information, the next step is to transfer it onto existing
|
{{< todo >}}This isn't as important probably, but might be worth talking about. {{< /todo >}}
|
||||||
Hugo HTML files. Within a file, I've made my `codelines` shortcode emit
|
|
||||||
custom attributes that can be used to find syntax-highlighted Agda code.
|
The most challenging step is probably to identify the Agda "projects" that need
|
||||||
The chief such attribute is `data-agda-block`; my script traverses all
|
to be built. Since different articles have different modules (possibly with
|
||||||
elements with this attribute.
|
the same name), I would need to keep them separate. Also, I'm not ruling
|
||||||
|
out the possibility of one project including another as a submodule. To
|
||||||
|
make this work, I wrote a little Ruby script to find all Agda files,
|
||||||
|
guess their project folder, and invoke the Agda compiler there. It boils
|
||||||
|
down to something like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
```Ruby
|
||||||
def process_source_file(file, document)
|
# For each Agda file, find the most specific project / subproject to which
|
||||||
# Process each highlight group that's been marked as an Agda file.
|
# it belongs.
|
||||||
document.css('div[data-agda-block]').each do |t|
|
files_for_paths = {}
|
||||||
# ...
|
Dir.glob("**/*.agda", base: root_path) do |agda_file|
|
||||||
```
|
best_path = max_path.call(agda_file)
|
||||||
|
files_for_path = files_for_paths.fetch(best_path) do
|
||||||
To figure out which Agda HTML file to use, and which lines to search for links,
|
files_for_paths[best_path] = []
|
||||||
the script also expects some additional attributes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
first_line, last_line = nil, nil
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if first_line_attr = t.attribute("data-first-line")
|
|
||||||
first_line = first_line_attr.to_s.to_i
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
if last_line_attr = t.attribute("data-last-line")
|
|
||||||
last_line = last_line_attr.to_s.to_i
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if first_line and last_line
|
|
||||||
line_range = first_line..last_line
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
# no line number attributes = the code block contains the whole file
|
|
||||||
line_range = 1..
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
full_path = t.attribute("data-file-path").to_s
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
At this point, the Agda file could be in some nested directory, like
|
|
||||||
`A/B/C/File.agda`. However, the project root -- the place where Agda modules
|
|
||||||
are compiled from -- could be any one of the folders `A`, `B`, or `C`.
|
|
||||||
Thus, the fully qualified module name for `File.agda` could be `File`,
|
|
||||||
`C.File`, `B.C.File`, or `A.B.C.File`. Since Agda's HTML output produces
|
|
||||||
files named after the fully qualified module name, the script needs to guess
|
|
||||||
what the module file is. This is where some conventions come in play:
|
|
||||||
I keep my code in folders directly nested within a top-level `code` directory;
|
|
||||||
thus, I'll have folders `project1` or `project2` inside `code`, and those
|
|
||||||
will always be project roots. As a result,
|
|
||||||
I guess that the first directory relative to `code` should be discarded,
|
|
||||||
while the rest should be included in the path. The only exception to this is
|
|
||||||
Git submodules: if an Agda file is included using a submodule, the root
|
|
||||||
directory of the submodule is considered the Agda project root. My Hugo theme
|
|
||||||
indicates the submodule using an additional `data-base-path` attribute; in all,
|
|
||||||
that leads to the following logic:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
full_path_dirs = Pathname(full_path).each_filename.to_a
|
|
||||||
base_path = t.attribute("data-base-path").to_s
|
|
||||||
base_dir_depth = 0
|
|
||||||
if base_path.empty?
|
|
||||||
# No submodules were used. Assume code/<X> is the root.
|
|
||||||
# The path of the file is given relative to `code`, so need
|
|
||||||
# to strip only the one outermost directory.
|
|
||||||
base_dir_depth = 1
|
|
||||||
base_path = full_path_dirs[0]
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
# The code is in a submodule. Assume that the base path / submodule
|
|
||||||
# root is the Agda module root, ignore all folders before that.
|
|
||||||
base_path_dirs = Pathname(base_path).each_filename.to_a
|
|
||||||
base_dir_depth = base_path_dirs.length
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
With that, the script determines the actual HTML file path ---
|
|
||||||
by assuming that there's an `html` folder in the same place as the Agda
|
|
||||||
project root --- and runs the above `process_agda_html_file`:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
dirs_in_base = full_path_dirs[base_dir_depth..-1]
|
|
||||||
html_file = dirs_in_base.join(".").gsub(/\.agda$/, ".html")
|
|
||||||
html_path = File.join(["code", base_path, "html", html_file])
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
agda_info = process_agda_html_file(html_path)
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The next step is specific to the output of Hugo's syntax highlighter,
|
|
||||||
[Chroma](https://github.com/alecthomas/chroma). When line numbers are enabled
|
|
||||||
-- and they are on my site -- Chroma generates a table that, at some point,
|
|
||||||
contains a bunch of `span` HTML nodes, each with the `line` class. Each
|
|
||||||
such `span` corresponds to a single line of output; naturally, the first
|
|
||||||
one contains the code from `first_line`, the second from `first_line + 1`,
|
|
||||||
and so on until `last_line`. This is quite convenient, because it saves the
|
|
||||||
headache of counting newlines the way that the Agda processing code above has to.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For each line of syntax-highlighted code, the script retrieves the corresponding
|
|
||||||
list of links that were collected from the Agda HTML file.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
lines = t.css("pre.chroma code[data-lang] .line")
|
|
||||||
lines.zip(line_range).each do |line, line_no|
|
|
||||||
line_info = agda_info[line_no]
|
|
||||||
next unless line_info
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The subsequent traversal -- which picks out the plain text of the Agda file
|
|
||||||
as [reasoned above](#plain-text) -- is very similar to the previous
|
|
||||||
one. Here too there's an `offset` variable, which gets incremented with
|
|
||||||
the length of a new plain text pieces. Since we know the lines match up
|
|
||||||
to `span`s, there's no need to count newlines.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
offset = 0
|
|
||||||
line.traverse do |lt|
|
|
||||||
if lt.text?
|
|
||||||
content = lt.content
|
|
||||||
new_offset = offset + content.length
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
At this point, we have a line number, and an offset within that line number
|
|
||||||
that describes the portion of the text under consideration. We can
|
|
||||||
traverse all the links for the line, and find ones that mark a piece of
|
|
||||||
text somewhere in this range. For the time being -- since inserting overlapping
|
|
||||||
spans is quite complicated -- I require the links to lie entirely within a
|
|
||||||
particular plain text region. As a result, if Chroma splits a single Agda
|
|
||||||
identifier into several tokens, it will not be linked. For now, this seems
|
|
||||||
like the most conservative and safe approach.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
matching_links = line_info.links.filter do |link|
|
|
||||||
link[:from] >= offset and link[:to] <= new_offset
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
# ...
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All that's left is to slice up the plain text fragment into a bunch of HTML
|
|
||||||
pieces: the substrings that are links will turn into `a` HTML nodes, while
|
|
||||||
the substrings that are "in between" the links will be left over as plain
|
|
||||||
text nodes. The code to do so is relatively verbose, but not all that complicated.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
replace_with = []
|
|
||||||
replace_offset = 0
|
|
||||||
matching_links.each do |match|
|
|
||||||
# The link's range is an offset from the beginning of the line,
|
|
||||||
# but the text piece we're splitting up might be partway into
|
|
||||||
# the line. Convert the link coordinates to piece-relative ones.
|
|
||||||
relative_from = match[:from] - offset
|
|
||||||
relative_to = match[:to] - offset
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# If the previous link ended some time before the new link
|
|
||||||
# began (or if the current link is the first one, and is not
|
|
||||||
# at the beginning), ensure that the plain text "in between"
|
|
||||||
# is kept.
|
|
||||||
replace_with << content[replace_offset...relative_from]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
tag = (match.include? :href) ? 'a' : 'span'
|
|
||||||
new_node = Nokogiri::XML::Node.new(tag, document)
|
|
||||||
if match.include? :href
|
|
||||||
# For nodes with links, note what they're referring to, so
|
|
||||||
# we can adjust their hrefs when we assign global IDs.
|
|
||||||
href = match[:href].to_s
|
|
||||||
new_node['href'] = note_used_href file, new_node, href
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
if match.include? :id
|
|
||||||
# For nodes with IDs visible in the current Hugo file, we'll
|
|
||||||
# want to redirect links that previously go to other Agda
|
|
||||||
# module HTML files. So, note the ID that we want to redirect,
|
|
||||||
# and pick a new unique ID to replace it with.
|
|
||||||
id = match[:id].to_s
|
|
||||||
new_node['id'] = note_defined_href file, "#{html_file}##{id}"
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
new_node.content = content[relative_from...relative_to]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
replace_with << new_node
|
|
||||||
replace_offset = relative_to
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
replace_with << content[replace_offset..-1]
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There's a little bit of a subtlety in the above code: specifically, I use
|
|
||||||
the `note_used_href` and `note_defined_href` methods. These are important
|
|
||||||
for rewriting links. Like I mentioned earlier, Agda's HTML output assumes
|
|
||||||
that each source file should produce a single HTML file -- named after its
|
|
||||||
qualified module -- and creates links accordingly. However, my blog posts
|
|
||||||
interweave multiple source files. Some links that would've jumped to a different
|
|
||||||
file must now point to an internal identifier within the page. Another
|
|
||||||
important aspect of the transformation is that, since I'm pulling HTML files
|
|
||||||
from distinct files, it's not guaranteed that each of them will have a unique
|
|
||||||
`id` attribute. After all, Agda just assigns sequential numbers to each
|
|
||||||
node that it generates; it would only take, e.g., including the first line
|
|
||||||
from two distinct modules to end up with two nodes with `id="1"`.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The solution is then twofold:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Track all the nodes referencing a particular `href` (made up of an HTML
|
|
||||||
file and a numerical identifier, like `File.html#123`). When we pick
|
|
||||||
new IDs -- thus guaranteeing their uniqueness -- we'll visit all the
|
|
||||||
nodes that refer to the old ID and HTML file, and update their `href`.
|
|
||||||
2. Track all existing Agda HTML IDs that we're inserting. If we transfer
|
|
||||||
an `<a id="1234">` onto the Hugo content, we know we'll need to pick a new
|
|
||||||
ID for it (since `1234` need not be unique), and that we'll need to redirect
|
|
||||||
the other links to that new ID as the previous bullet describes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here's how these two methods work:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
def note_defined_href(file, href)
|
|
||||||
file_hrefs = @local_seen_hrefs.fetch(file) do
|
|
||||||
@local_seen_hrefs[file] = {}
|
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
uniq_id = file_hrefs.fetch(href) do
|
# Strip the project prefix from the Agda file's path, since
|
||||||
new_id = "agda-unique-ident-#{@id_counter}"
|
# Agda compiler will be invoked in the project's folder.
|
||||||
@id_counter += 1
|
files_for_path << agda_file[best_path.length + File::SEPARATOR.length..-1]
|
||||||
file_hrefs[href] = new_id
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
unless @global_seen_hrefs.include? href
|
|
||||||
@global_seen_hrefs[href] = { :file => file, :id => uniq_id }
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return uniq_id
|
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def note_used_href(file, node, href)
|
original_wd = Dir.getwd
|
||||||
ref_list = @nodes_referencing_href.fetch(href) { @nodes_referencing_href[href] = [] }
|
files_for_paths.each do |path, files|
|
||||||
ref_list << { :file => file, :node => node }
|
# There might be a cleaner way of doing this, but it's convenient.
|
||||||
return href
|
Dir.chdir(original_wd)
|
||||||
end
|
Dir.chdir(File.join(root_path, path))
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Note that they use class variables: these are methods on a `FileGroup` class.
|
# Wherever the target directory is, create a folder that corresponds to
|
||||||
I've omitted the various classes I've declared from the above code for brevity,
|
# the project being built, to avoid "cross-contaminating" the output
|
||||||
but here it makes sense to show them. Like I mentioned earlier, you can
|
# folder with distinct modules with the same name.
|
||||||
view the [complete code here](https://dev.danilafe.com/Web-Projects/blog-static/src/commit/6a168f2fe144850ed3a81b796e07266cbf80f382/agda.rb).
|
html_dir = File.join [target_dir, path, "html"]
|
||||||
|
FileUtils.mkdir_p html_dir
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Interestingly, `note_defined_href` makes use of _two_ global maps:
|
# Just shell out to Agda using the --html folder.
|
||||||
`@local_seen_hrefs` and `@global_seen_hrefs`. This helps satisfy the third
|
files.each do |file|
|
||||||
constraint above, which is linking between code defined in the same series.
|
command = "#{ARGV[0]} --local-interfaces #{file} --html --html-dir=#{html_dir}"
|
||||||
The logic is as follows: when rewriting a link to a new HTML file and ID,
|
puts command
|
||||||
if the code we're trying to link to exists on the current page, we should link
|
puts `#{command}`
|
||||||
to that. Otherwise, if the code we're trying to link to was presented in
|
|
||||||
a different part of the series, then we should link to that other part.
|
|
||||||
So, we consult the "local" map for `href`s that will be rewritten to HTML
|
|
||||||
nodes in the current file, and as a fallback, consult the "global" map for
|
|
||||||
`hrefs` that were introduced in other parts. The `note_defined_href` populates
|
|
||||||
both maps, and is "biased" towards the first occurrence of a piece of code:
|
|
||||||
if posts A and B define a function `f`, and post C only references `f`, then
|
|
||||||
that link will go to post A's definition, which came earlier.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The other method, `note_used_href`, is simpler. It just appends to a list
|
|
||||||
of Nokogiri HTML nodes that reference a given `href`. We keep track of the file
|
|
||||||
in which the reference occurred so we can be sure to consult the right sub-map
|
|
||||||
of `@local_seen_hrefs` when checking for in-page rewrites.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
After running `process_source_file` on all Hugo HTML files within a particular
|
|
||||||
series, the following holds true:
|
|
||||||
* We have inserted `span` or `a` nodes wherever Agda's original output
|
|
||||||
had nodes with `id` or `href` elements. This is with the exception of the
|
|
||||||
case where Hugo's inline HTML doesn't "line up" with Agda's inline HTML,
|
|
||||||
which I've only found to happen when the leading character of an identifier is a digit.
|
|
||||||
* We have picked new IDs for each HTML node we inserted that had an ID,
|
|
||||||
noting them both globally and for the current file. We noted their original
|
|
||||||
`href` value (in the form `File.html#123`) and that it should be transformed
|
|
||||||
into our globally-unique identifiers, in the form `agda-unique-ident-1234`.
|
|
||||||
* For each HTML node we inserted that links to another, we noted the `href`
|
|
||||||
of the reference (also in the form `File.html#123`).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now, all that's left is to redirect the `href`s of the nodes we inserted
|
|
||||||
from their old values to the new ones. I do this by iterating over `@nodes_referencing_href`,
|
|
||||||
which contains every link we inserted.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```Ruby
|
|
||||||
def cross_link_files
|
|
||||||
@nodes_referencing_href.each do |href, references|
|
|
||||||
references.each do |reference|
|
|
||||||
file = reference[:file]
|
|
||||||
node = reference[:node]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
local_targets = @local_seen_hrefs[file]
|
|
||||||
if local_targets.include? href
|
|
||||||
# A code block in this file provides this href, create a local link.
|
|
||||||
node['href'] = "##{local_targets[href]}"
|
|
||||||
elsif @global_seen_hrefs.include? href
|
|
||||||
# A code block in this series, but not in this file, defines
|
|
||||||
# this href. Create a cross-file link.
|
|
||||||
target = @global_seen_hrefs[href]
|
|
||||||
other_file = target[:file]
|
|
||||||
id = target[:id]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
relpath = Pathname.new(other_file).dirname.relative_path_from(Pathname.new(file).dirname)
|
|
||||||
node['href'] = "#{relpath}##{id}"
|
|
||||||
else
|
|
||||||
# No definitions in any blog page. For now, just delete the anchor.
|
|
||||||
node.replace node.content
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
end
|
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Notice that for the time being, I simply remove links to Agda definitions that
|
In short, it traverses all the folders in my `code` directory -- which is where
|
||||||
didn't occur in the Hugo post. Ideally, this would link to the plain, non-blog
|
I keep my code, looking for Agda source files. Once it finds them,
|
||||||
documentation page generated by Agda; however, this requires either hosting
|
|
||||||
those documentation pages, or expecting the Agda standard library HTML pages
|
|
||||||
to remain stable and hosted at a fixed URL. Neither was simple enough to do,
|
|
||||||
so I opted for the conservative "just don't insert links" approach.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
And that's all of the approach that I wanted to show off today! There
|
|
||||||
are other details, like finding posts in the same series (I achieve this
|
|
||||||
with a `meta` element) and invoking `agda --html` on the necessary source files
|
|
||||||
(my [`build-agda-html.rb`](https://dev.danilafe.com/Web-Projects/blog-static/src/branch/master/build-agda-html.rb)
|
|
||||||
script is how I personally do this), but I don't think it's all that valuable
|
|
||||||
to describe them here.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Unfortunately, the additional metadata I had my theme insert makes it
|
|
||||||
harder for others to use this approach out of the box. However, I hope that by
|
|
||||||
sharing my experience, others who write Agda and post about it might be able
|
|
||||||
to get a similar solution working. And of course, it's always fun to write
|
|
||||||
about a recent project or endeavor.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Happy (dependently typed) programming and blogging!
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||||
Subproject commit 97e965feece9fd3d3a5328156c043bd2a0cca80f
|
Subproject commit 5bfbaf397b26e20b9f2e8f7e1246674e2c2417b3
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user