Compare commits
2 Commits
d94ceeab2e
...
dde7df4604
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
dde7df4604 | |||
e4101f1396 |
|
@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ defaultContentLanguage = 'en'
|
|||
|
||||
[params]
|
||||
bergamotJsUrl = "https://static.danilafe.com/bergamot/bergamot.js"
|
||||
bergamotObjectLanguageJsUrl = "https://static.danilafe.com/bergamot/objectlang.js"
|
||||
katexJsUrl = "https://static.danilafe.com/katex/katex.min.js"
|
||||
plausibleAnalyticsDomain = "danilafe.com"
|
||||
githubUsername = "DanilaFe"
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ to the tool than to type theory itself; I will denote these exercises as such wh
|
|||
possible. Also, whenever the context of the exercise can be loaded into
|
||||
Bergamot, I will denote this with a play button.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="intro-preset" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" >}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="intro-preset" prompt="type(TERM, ?t)" >}}
|
||||
TNumber @ type(lit(?n), number) <- num(?n);
|
||||
TPlusI @ type(plus(?e_1, ?e_2), number) <-
|
||||
type(?e_1, number), type(?e_2, number);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Another consequence of this is that not everyone agrees on notation; according
|
|||
to [this paper](https://labs.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=LABS:0::APPLICATION_PROCESS%3DGETDOC_INLINE:::DOC_ID:959),
|
||||
27 different ways of writing down substitutions were observed in the POPL conference alone.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="notation-preset" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" >}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="notation-preset" prompt="type(TERM, ?t)" >}}
|
||||
TNumber @ type(lit(?n), number) <- num(?n);
|
||||
{{< /bergamot_preset >}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ This rule is read as follows:
|
|||
|
||||
> If \(e_1\) and \(e_2\) have type \(\text{string}\), then \(e_1+e_2\) has type \(\text{string}\).
|
||||
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="string-preset" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" query="\"hello\"+\"world\"">}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="string-preset" prompt="type(TERM, ?t)" query="\"hello\"+\"world\"">}}
|
||||
TNumber @ type(lit(?n), number) <- num(?n);
|
||||
TPlusI @ type(plus(?e_1, ?e_2), number) <-
|
||||
type(?e_1, number), type(?e_2, number);
|
||||
|
@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ from the conversion rules. Chapter 15 of _Types and Programming Languages_
|
|||
by Benjamin Pierce is a nice explanation, but the [Wikipedia page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtyping)
|
||||
ain't bad, either.
|
||||
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="conversion-preset" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" >}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_preset name="conversion-preset" prompt="type(TERM, ?t)" >}}
|
||||
section "Conversion rules" {
|
||||
ConvertsIS @ converts(integer, string) <-;
|
||||
ConvertsIF @ converts(integer, float) <-;
|
||||
|
@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ and already be up-to-speed on a big chunk of the content.
|
|||
| {{< latex >}}\frac{e_1 : \text{number}\quad e_2 : \text{number}}{e_1+e_2 : \text{number}} {{< /latex >}}| Adding numbers gives a number |
|
||||
|
||||
#### Playground
|
||||
{{< bergamot_widget id="widget" query="" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" >}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_widget id="widget" query="" prompt="type(TERM, ?t)" >}}
|
||||
section "" {
|
||||
TNumber @ type(lit(?n), number) <- num(?n);
|
||||
TString @ type(lit(?s), string) <- str(?s);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ are an essential ingredient to formalizing the analyses in Anders Møller's
|
|||
lecture notes. However, there can be no program analysis without a program
|
||||
to analyze! In this post, I will define the (very simple) language that we
|
||||
will be analyzing. An essential aspect of the language is its
|
||||
[semantics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics_(computer_science), which
|
||||
[semantics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics_(computer_science)), which
|
||||
simply speaking explains what each feature of the language does. At the end
|
||||
of the previous article, I gave the following _inference rule_ which defined
|
||||
(partially) how the `if`-`else` statement in the language works.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ It has two modes:
|
|||
`type(empty, ?e, tpair(number, string))` to search for expressions that have
|
||||
the type "a pair of a number and a string".
|
||||
|
||||
{{< bergamot_widget id="widget" query="" prompt="PromptConverter @ prompt(type(empty, ?term, ?t)) <- input(?term);" >}}
|
||||
{{< bergamot_widget id="widget" query="" prompt="type(empty, TERM, ?t)" >}}
|
||||
section "" {
|
||||
TNumber @ type(?Gamma, lit(?n), number) <- num(?n);
|
||||
TString @ type(?Gamma, lit(?s), string) <- str(?s);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
|||
<script defer src="{{ .Site.Params.bergamotJsUrl }}"></script>
|
||||
<script defer src="{{ .Site.Params.bergamotObjectLanguageJsUrl }}"></script>
|
||||
{{ $style := resources.Get "scss/bergamot.scss" | resources.ToCSS | resources.Minify }}
|
||||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ $style.Permalink }}">
|
||||
<script defer>
|
||||
|
@ -95,11 +96,64 @@ const setRunning = (inputGroup, running) => {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The object language parsing is handling by a separate standalone Elm
|
||||
// application in the ObjectLanguage module, which has two ports:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// * `parseString` requests a string to be parsed
|
||||
// * `parsedString` returns the parsed string, or null
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We want there to be a single global ObjectLanguage object, but it works
|
||||
// on a "subscription" model (we have to give a callback to its port).
|
||||
// Configure this callback to invoke `resolve` functions from a list,
|
||||
// so that callers can just get a promise. This way we aren't continuously
|
||||
// registering more and more handlers for each parsed string, and we can
|
||||
// use a convenient promise API.
|
||||
const parsingPromiseResolvers = {};
|
||||
const ensureObjectLanguage = () => {
|
||||
if (!window.Bergamot.ObjectLanguage) {
|
||||
window.Bergamot.ObjectLanguage = Elm.Bergamot.ObjectLanguage.init({});
|
||||
window.Bergamot.ObjectLanguage.ports.parsedString.subscribe(({ string, term }) => {
|
||||
if (string in parsingPromiseResolvers) {
|
||||
for (const resolver of parsingPromiseResolvers[string]) {
|
||||
resolver(term);
|
||||
}
|
||||
parsingPromiseResolvers[string] = [];
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
return window.Bergamot.ObjectLanguage;
|
||||
}
|
||||
const parseString = (str) => {
|
||||
if (!(str in parsingPromiseResolvers)) {
|
||||
parsingPromiseResolvers[str] = [];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return new Promise(resolve => {
|
||||
parsingPromiseResolvers[str].push(resolve);
|
||||
ensureObjectLanguage().ports.parseString.send(str);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
window.Bergamot = {};
|
||||
window.Bergamot.run = (inputGroup, nodeId, inputPrompt, rules, renderRules, query) => {
|
||||
window.Bergamot.run = (inputGroup, nodeId, inputPrompt, rules, renderRules, input) => {
|
||||
var app = Elm.Main.init({
|
||||
node: document.getElementById(nodeId),
|
||||
flags: { renderRules, inputRules: inputPrompt, rules , query }
|
||||
flags: {
|
||||
inputModes: {
|
||||
"Languge Term": { "custom": "Language Term" },
|
||||
"Query": "query"
|
||||
},
|
||||
renderRules, rules, input
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
app.ports.convertInput.subscribe(async ({ mode, input }) => {
|
||||
let query = await parseString(input);
|
||||
if (query !== null) {
|
||||
query = inputPrompt.replace("TERM", query);
|
||||
app.ports.receiveConverted.send({ input, result: { query } });
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
app.ports.receiveConverted.send({ input, result: { error: "Unable to parse object language term" } });
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
loadedWidgets[nodeId] = { app, parentNode: inputGroup ? inputGroup.parentElement : null };
|
||||
setRunning(inputGroup, true);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user