Add a very rough draft of the idris catemorphisms article I found lying around
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c62107e3b
commit
1a6f5e061b
47
content/blog/idris_catamorphisms.md
Normal file
47
content/blog/idris_catamorphisms.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
title: "Induction Principles from Base Functors"
|
||||||
|
date: 2022-04-22T12:19:22-07:00
|
||||||
|
tags: ["Idris"]
|
||||||
|
draft: true
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
In the [Haskell catamorphisms article]({{< relref "haskell_catamorphisms" >}}), we looked
|
||||||
|
at how base functors and functions of the type `F a -> a` can be used to
|
||||||
|
derive "fold" functions on inductive data types. This formulation allows for
|
||||||
|
one more interesting trick, one that I found to be extremely interesting and
|
||||||
|
worth covering. However, this trick requires a more powerful type system
|
||||||
|
than Haskell provides us; it requires depdendent types.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This article assumes a working knowledge of dependent types. I will not
|
||||||
|
spend time explaining dependent types, nor the syntax for them in Idris,
|
||||||
|
which is the language I'll use in this article. Below are a few resources
|
||||||
|
that should help you get up to speed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{{< todo >}}List resources{{< /todo >}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We've seen that, given a function `F a -> a`, we can define a function
|
||||||
|
`B -> a`, if `F` is a base functor of the type `B`. However, what if
|
||||||
|
the goal is to define a function in which the return type `a` depends
|
||||||
|
on the value of `B`? In other words, what if we want to define a function
|
||||||
|
with type:
|
||||||
|
```Idris
|
||||||
|
someFunction : (b : B) -> P b
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
How might we achieve such a thing? Unlike the generic type `a`, we can't
|
||||||
|
simply place `P` into the base functor `F`; the following is completely
|
||||||
|
invalid.
|
||||||
|
```Idris
|
||||||
|
-- Completely bogus
|
||||||
|
argType : Type
|
||||||
|
argType = F P -> P
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
In our case, `P` is a type family, rather than a type; in order to use it as
|
||||||
|
a parameter to the base functor, we need to feed it an argument (of type `B`).
|
||||||
|
Well, we've already seen one way to get a value `b` of type `B` at the type
|
||||||
|
level: we can use a dependent function. This too is not correct, but it does get us a little bit closer to the goal.
|
||||||
|
```Idris
|
||||||
|
-- Still bogus
|
||||||
|
argType : Type
|
||||||
|
argType = (b : B) -> F (P b) -> P b
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Recall that the base functor `F` effectively denotes a single layer of a data
|
||||||
|
structure, with recursive
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user