Resume work on polymorphism post

This commit is contained in:
Danila Fedorin 2020-02-29 20:15:37 -08:00
parent ae9805e4f2
commit fc444c1986

View File

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
--- ---
title: Compiling a Functional Language Using C++, Part 10 - Polymorphism title: Compiling a Functional Language Using C++, Part 10 - Polymorphism
date: 2019-12-09T23:26:46-08:00 date: 2020-02-29T20:09:37-08:00
tags: ["C and C++", "Functional Languages", "Compilers"] tags: ["C and C++", "Functional Languages", "Compilers"]
draft: true draft: true
--- ---
Last time, we wrote some pretty interesting programs in our little language. [In part 8]({{< relref "08_compiler_llvm.md" >}}), we wrote some pretty interesting programs in our little language.
We successfully expressed arithmetic and recursion. But there's one thing We successfully expressed arithmetic and recursion. But there's one thing
that we cannot express in our language without further changes: an `if` statement. that we cannot express in our language without further changes: an `if` statement.
@ -49,17 +49,15 @@ set of rules to describe our program's types. One such set of rules is
the [Hindley-Milner type system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindley%E2%80%93Milner_type_system), the [Hindley-Milner type system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindley%E2%80%93Milner_type_system),
which we have previously alluded to. In fact, the rules we came up which we have previously alluded to. In fact, the rules we came up
with were already very close to Hindley-Milner, with the exception of two: with were already very close to Hindley-Milner, with the exception of two:
__generalization__ and __instantiation__. Instantiation first: __generalization__ and __instantiation__. It's been quite a while since the last time we worked on typechecking, so I'm going
to present a table with these new rules, as well as all of the ones that we previously used. I will also give a quick
summary of each of these rules.
$$ Rule|Name and Description
\frac -----|-------
{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma \\quad \\sigma' \\sqsubseteq \\sigma} $$\\frac{x:\\sigma \\in \\Gamma}{\\Gamma \\vdash x:\\sigma}$$| __Var__: If the variable \\(x\\) is known to have some polymorphic type \\(\\sigma\\) then an expression consisting only of that variable is of that type.
{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma'} $$\\frac{\\Gamma \\vdash e\_1 : \\tau\_1 \\rightarrow \\tau\_2 \\quad \\Gamma \\vdash e\_2 : \\tau\_1}{\\Gamma \\vdash e\_1 \\; e\_2 : \\tau\_2}$$| __App__: If an expression \\(e\_1\\), which is a function from monomorphic type \\(\\tau\_1\\) to another monomorphic type \\(\\tau\_2\\), is applied to an argument \\(e\_2\\) of type \\(\\tau\_1\\), then the result is of type \\(\\tau\_2\\).
$$ $$\\frac{\\Gamma, x:\\tau \\vdash e : \\tau'}{\\Gamma \\vdash \\lambda x.e : \\tau \\rightarrow \\tau'}$$| __Abs__: If the body \\(e\\) of a lambda abstraction \\(\\lambda x.e\\) is of type \\(\\tau'\\) when \\(x\\) is of type \\(\\tau\\) then the whole lambda abstraction is of type \\(\\tau \\rightarrow \\tau'\\).
$$\\frac{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\tau \\quad \\text{matcht}(\\tau, p\_i) = b\_i \\quad \\Gamma,b\_i \\vdash e\_i : \\tau\_c}{\\Gamma \\vdash \\text{case} \\; e \\; \\text{of} \\; \\\{ (p\_1,e\_1) \\ldots (p\_n, e\_n) \\\} : \\tau\_c }$$ | __Case__: This rule is not part of Hindley-Milner, and is specific to our language. If the expression being case-analyzed is of type \\(\\tau\\) and each branch \\((p\_i, e\_i)\\) is of the same type \\(\\tau\_c\\) when the pattern \\(p\_i\\) works with type \\(\\tau\\) producing extra bindings \\(b\_i\\), the whole case expression is of type \\(\\tau\_c\\).
Next, generalization: $$\\frac{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma \\quad \\sigma' \\sqsubseteq \\sigma}{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma'}$$| __Inst (New)__: If type \\(\\sigma'\\) is an instantiation of type \\(\\sigma\\) then an expression of type \\(\\sigma\\) is also an expression of type \\(\\sigma'\\).
$$ $$\\frac{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma \\quad \\alpha \\not \\in \\text{free}(\\Gamma)}{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\forall a . \\sigma}$$| __Gen (New)__: If an expression has a type with free variables, this rule allows us generalize it to allow all possible types to be used for these free variables.
\frac
{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\sigma \\quad \\alpha \\not \\in \\text{free}(\\Gamma)}
{\\Gamma \\vdash e : \\forall a . \\sigma}
$$