|
|
8a85c4497c
|
Prove that evaluation is monotonic and complete sign analysis
Other than monotonicity of plus and minus, god damn it.
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 21:25:46 -07:00 |
|
|
|
8964ba59a1
|
Prove monotonicity of eval
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 20:29:05 -07:00 |
|
|
|
96f3ceaeb2
|
Use the previous join function directly in GeneralizedUpdate
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 19:41:02 -07:00 |
|
|
|
237250cf72
|
Stop using modules in 'Sign' analysis
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 19:23:48 -07:00 |
|
|
|
8515491327
|
Simplify AboveBelow a bit to avoid nested modules
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 18:43:10 -07:00 |
|
|
|
f21ebdcf46
|
Start working on the evaluation operation.
Proving monotonicity is the main hurdle here.
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 18:13:01 -07:00 |
|
|
|
51accb6438
|
Define 'minus', too -- with no monotonicity proof.
I'm still thinking about how this should be achieved most easily.
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 16:40:49 -07:00 |
|
|
|
afe5bac2dc
|
Commit result of (unsuccessfully) trying to prove monotonicity of plus.
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-10 13:54:19 -07:00 |
|
|
|
f84a1c923c
|
Prove that the 'join' transformation is monotonic
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-09 23:06:47 -08:00 |
|
|
|
1b1b80465c
|
Use named modules to avoid having to pass redundant parameters
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-09 21:46:15 -08:00 |
|
|
|
0c30f8be48
|
Start on sign analysis (mostly just imports)
Signed-off-by: Danila Fedorin <danila.fedorin@gmail.com>
|
2024-03-09 14:00:10 -08:00 |
|
